Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, Chairperson, SUDHIR AGARWAL, Judicial Member, A. SENTHIL VEL, Expert Member, AFROZ AHMAD, Expert Member
SUKHDEEP SINGH BUTTER – Appellant
Versus
PUNJAB POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal challenges ppcb consent refusal orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. prior closure and consent denials in residential area. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. appeals dismissed; supreme court remands for merits. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. unit restarts; ppcb finds no pollution, drops notice. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. subsequent oas dismissed; fresh complaints rejected. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. maintainability questioned under ngt act sections. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. no section 33a direction or section 31 appeal. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 40 , 41) |
| 8. no air pollutant emission; consent not required. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 9. noise pollution unproven; further monitoring directed. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 10. appeal disposed; noise report and decision mandated. (Para 51 , 52) |
JUDGMENT
BY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER
1. This Appeal has been preferred with a prayer to set aside orders, dated 30.10.2023 passed by Punjab Pollution Control Board (hereinafter referred to as ‘PPCB’) and dated 07.11.2022 passed by Senior Environmental Engineer, PPCB, Patiala. The Appellant has referred Sections 14, 15, 16,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
