Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Arun Kumar Tyagi, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Pushpender – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. letter petition registers pollution complaint. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. joint committee verifies site pollution levels. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondents claim compliance with norms. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. marginal pollution exceeds require remediation. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. zero discharge prohibits effluent in drains. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. groundwater study needed for contamination causes. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 7. air pollution controls must cover fugitive emissions. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 8. fly ash disposal follows moef notifications. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 9. green belt must cover 33% project area. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64) |
| 10. csr mandates ongoing ro plant maintenance. (Para 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76) |
| 11. csr/cer prioritizes local environmental activities. (Para 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82) |
| 12. directions enforce compliance and remediation. (Para 83 , 84 , 85 , 86) |
Judgment
PRONOUNCED BY: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, JM 1. Mr. Pushpender resident of Village Berni, Post Bemra, Shankargadh, Tehsil Bara, District Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh has sent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
