SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 2596

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL KOLKATA (EASTERN ZONE BENCH)
B. Amit Sthalekar, Judicial Member, Arun Kumar Verma, Expert Member
Yodh BDR Thapa – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. – Respondent
Execution Application No.02/2024/EZ|Original Application No.154/2022/EZ



Advocates:
For Applicant(s): Mr. Akshar Bhatt, Mr. Sajal Sharma
For Respondent(s): Ms. Aasia Hasan, Mr. Vikram Wadehra, Mr. Sameer Abhyankar, Mr. Aakash Thakur, Mr. Surendra Kumar, Mr. Raj Kumar, Mr. Ashok Prasad, Mr. Apurba Ghosh

Petrol depots require distinct SOP with 250-300m buffer from habitation, distinguishing from retail outlets' 50m norms; CPCB/State SOPs incorporate expert recommendations for zero risk at boundaries.

Headnote:(A) Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Manufacture Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 1989 - Petroleum Rules, 2002 - Siting criteria for petrol depots - Distinction from retail outlets - CPCB guidelines of 07.01.2020 for retail outlets (50m buffer from residential areas, schools, hospitals) inapplicable to depots storing hazardous substances like petrol (1065 KL capacity) - Tribunal directed CPCB to prepare SOP for depots, restraining construction pending SOP (paras 5, 17 of 17.04.2023 order). (Paras 2-5)

(B) Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Petrol Depots - Evolved by CPCB incorporating MB Lal Committee recommendations (post-fire accident investigation) accepted by Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas - Mandates 250-300m buffer zone from residential areas, educational institutions, healthcare facilities, places of worship, etc., with zero quantitative/cumulative risk at boundary; 100m from water bodies; green belt; baseline monitoring - State PCB revised SOP accordingly for urban/rural areas, prohibiting depots in residential zones, requiring clearances, QRA, emergency protocols (paras 8-19). (Paras 15-18)

(C) Execution Application - Compliance verified: No construction post-restraining order; SOPs implemented countrywide expected; State respondents directed to enforce revised SOP strictly. (Paras 6-22)

Facts of the case:
Applicant challenged setting up of petrol depot adjacent to residential plot (15ft from boundary, 24ft from office, 64ft from dispensing unit) in mountainous urban area, alleging violation of retail outlet siting criteria. Tribunal distinguished depots from outlets, directed SOP preparation, restrained construction. Execution sought enforcement; respondents confirmed compliance, filed SOPs.

Findings of Court:
CPCB and State SOPs now mandate 250-300m buffer zones aligning with expert recommendations; site violates even prior criteria; revised SOPs comprehensive for safety in hazardous storage.

Issues: Applicability of retail outlet guidelines to depots; need for dedicated SOP; buffer zone requirements near human habitation; compliance with restraining order and SOP enforcement.

Ratio Decidendi: Petrol depots, as hazardous storage facilities, require distinct stringent SOPs with 250-300m buffers from habitation per expert committee, superseding retail outlet norms; SOPs must ensure zero risk, mitigation, environmental safeguards; states to enforce uniformly.

Result: Execution Application disposed of; State respondents directed to strictly enforce revised SOP. No costs.

Table of Content
1. cpcb siting criteria inapplicable to petrol depots (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. execution application for compliance verification (Para 6 , 7)
3. sikkim sop requires 100m distance from residences (Para 8 , 9 , 18 , 19)
4. cpcb sop mandates 100m from water bodies (Para 10 , 16)
5. mb lal committee recommends 250-300m buffer zone (Para 11 , 12 , 15 , 20 , 21)
6. strict enforcement of revised sop required (Para 13 , 14 , 17 , 22)

ORDER

1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2. The Original Application No.154/2022/EZ (Yodh BDR Thapa Vs.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited & Ors.) was filed by the Applicant therein alleging that the Respondent No.1, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), is setting-up a Petrol Depot on Plot No. 2242 which is adjacent to the plot of the Applicant being Plot No. 2254 and Plot No. 2242 is under the proprietorship of one Mr. Arjun Chhetri, proprietor of M/s Pankaj Fuel, which is stated to have been leased out to the Respondent No.1.

3. The allegation of the Applicant is that the said Petrol Depot is being set-up in violation of the Siting Criteria laid down by the Central Pollution Control Board in its Circular dated 07.01.2020, copy of which has been filed as Annexure A-16 to the Original Application.

4. The case of the Applicant further was that as per the Siting Criteria laid down by the Central Pollution Control Board in its Notification dated 07.01.2020, petrol pumps/new retail outlets shall not be located within a radial distance of 50 meters from the filling point/dispensing units/vent pipe whichever is nearest) from schools, hospitals and residential areas. Paragraph ‘H’ of the Siting Criteria of the said Notification reads as under: -

“H. Siting Criteria for Retail Outlets:

In case of siting criteria for petrol pumps new Retail outlets shall not be located within a radial distance of 50 meters (from fill point/dispensing units/vent pipe whichever is nearest) from schools, hospitals (10 beds and above) and residential areas designated as per local laws. In case of constraints in providing 50 meters distance, the retail outlet shall implement additional safety measures as prescribed by PESO. In no case the distance between new retail outlet from schools, hospitals (10 beds and above) and residential area designated as per local laws shall be less than 30 meters. No high tension line shall pass over the retail outlet.”

5. The Original Application was disposed of by this Tribunal vide order dated 17.04.2023. The findings of the Tribunal and the directions given therein read as under :-

“17. There is no dispute between the parties that what is being setup by the Respondent No.1 is not a petrol retail outlet but a petrol depot having a capacity of 1065 KL equivalent to 10,65,000 liters of petrol. It cannot be gainsaid that petrol is a hazardous substance within the meaning of the term as defined in Part I of Schedule 1of the Rules, 1989. Here we are not concerned with a case of setting up of a petrol pump/retail outlet and therefore, the CPCB guidelines of 07.01.2020 have no application in the present case.

18. Be that as it may, the Spot Verification Report of the SDM, Rangpo clearly states that the Petrol Depot site in question is situate 15 ft. from the boundary wall of the Applicant, 24 ft. away from its office and 64 ft. away from its dispensing Unit. In this view of the matter, even if assuming that the CPCB guidelines of 07.01.2020 were applicable, the siting of the retail depot in question is in violation of the siting criteria given therein.

19. Having said that, we find there is no Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) with regard to establishment of Petrol Depots as distinguished from petrol pumps/retail outlets. It appears that the District Administration while issuing the NOC has not taken into consideration the fact that the Depot is situated in a mountainous urban area where the residential establishments are situated not only to the right, left and in front of the Depot but a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top