SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 2617


Item No. 09 BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONE BENCH, BHOPAL (Through Video Conferencing)
Execution Application No. 11/2023(CZ)
In Original Application No. 76/2021(CZ)
(I.A. No. 137/2023)
Dr. P.G. Najpandey & Ors. Applicant(s)
Vs.
State of Madhya Pradesh& Ors. Respondent(s)
Date of Hearing: 12.07.2024 CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEO KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER For Applicant(s): M r. Prabhat Yadav, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prashant M. Harne, Adv.
Ms. Parul Bhadoria, Adv.

ORDER

1. This Execution Application has been filed to execute the order of the Tribunal passed in O.A. No. 76/2021(CZ) and directions of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India passed in W.P.(C) No. 728/2015. A report was called from the respondents which has been filed.

2. Heard the argument and perused the record.

3. Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in WP(C) 728/2015 vide order dated 29.10.2021 issued directions to take actions against those who sale banned fire crackers. Accordingly, Home Ministry of Govt. of MP issued directions on 31.10.2021 to all Collectors and Superintendent of Police of MP for inspection and testing of fire crackers and for taking an undertaking from sellers of fire crackers that they will abide the directions of MP Govt. But this circular of Govt. of MP became a white wash since undertakings were not taken from sellers of fire crackers during the year 2022-23 and thereafter also sampling and testing of fire crackers has not still been done.

4. The contention of the applicant is that the undertaking and testing as narrated by directions issued by the M.P. Govt. have not been carried out, which resulted in violation of direction of Hon’ble Supreme Court and further aggravating the air quality index in the region, adversely affecting the health of the public.

5. Vide order dated 19.10.2023 in above Execution Application No. 11/2023, the orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India dated 23.10.2018 was repeated and orders passed in Original Application No. 76/2021 (CZ) was directed to be enforced in letter and spirit. Some of the observations are quoted below:-

i. The Chief Secretaries and DGPs may issue and circulate an appropriate order in above terms with appropriate enforcement guidelines to all the District Magistrates and Superintendents of Police, PCBs/PCCs.

ii. As a consequence, production and sale of crackers other than those mentioned in Suggestions II and III is hereby banned.

iii. The manufacture, sale and use of joined firecrackers (series crackers or laris) is hereby banned as the same causes huge air, noise and solid waste problems.

iv. The sale shall only be through licensed traders and it shall be ensured that these licensed traders are selling those firecrackers which are permitted by this order.

v. PESO is directed to review the clinical composition of fireworks, particularly reducing Aluminium content, and shall submit its report in respect thereof within a period of two weeks from today. For undertaking this exercise, PESO would also associate FRDC.

vi. PESO will ensure fireworks with permitted chemicals only to be purchased / possessed /sold /used during Diwali and all other religious festivals, of any religion whatsoever, and other occasions like marriages, etc. It shall test and check for the presence of banned chemicals like lithium /arsenic / antimony / lead/mercury.

vii. PESO will ensure suspension of the licences of manufacturers of such fireworks items and appropriate disposal of such stock.

viii. Extensive public awareness campaigns shall be taken up by the Central Government/State Governments /Schools/ Colleges informing the public about the harmful effects of firecrackers.

ix. All the official respondents, and particularly the police, shall ensure that fireworks take place only during the designated time and at designated places, as mentioned above. They shall also ensure that there is no sale of banned firecrackers. In case any violation is found, the Station House Officer (SHO) of the police station of the area concerned shall be held personally liable for such violation and this would amount to committing contempt of the Court, for which such SHO(s) would be proceeded against.

x. The “onus of proof” is on the actor or the developer/industrialist to show that his action is environmentally benign.

xi. As per the Noise Control rules, the responsibility for enforcement of noise pollution control measures is of the ‘authority’, which includes authorized officers, District Magistrates, Police Commissio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top