Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL KOLKATA (EASTERN ZONE BENCH)
B. Amit Sthalekar, Judicial Member, Arun Kumar Verma, Expert Member
Binay Basfore – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. alleged illegal pond filling and boundary wall construction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. official reports confirm partial filling; fir and chargesheet filed. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. pond restoration confirmed; no recent filling observed. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. applicant disputes restoration; opposes boundary walls. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. joint inspection verifies restoration; directs maintenance. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 6. denial of filling; boundary walls allowed in residential area. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. directs pond maintenance and action against dumping. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
ORDER
1. The allegation of the Applicant in the present Original Application is that the Respondent No.12, Mohammad Moinuddin Ansari, is filling up a pond measuring about 20 decimals situated in L.R. Dag No.305/477, L.R. Khatian No.1128, J.L. No.32, Police Station- Sankrail of Mouza-Banipur, District-Howrah. It is stated that the Respondent No.12 is the owner of the „Pukur Par‟ (Pond) in question which is recorded as such in the Record of Rights.
2. It is alleged that the Respondent No.12 had constructed a brick boundary wall on the said „Pukur Par‟ against which a writ petition be
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
