Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Arun Kumar Verma, Expert Member
Anany Singh Pawar – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. alleged park encroachment and tree cutting under re-densification. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. government approvals and re-densification policy compliance. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments on green belt maintenance and compensatory planting. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. constitutional and policy emphasis on forest conservation. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. application upheld with enhanced afforestation directions. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
ORDER
1. The grievance of the applicant in this application is encroachment on the two public parks in the Rajasva Colony, Gurunank Market Friganj, District Ujjan (M.P.), cutting of the trees which are properly grown up, violation of conditions of necessity of play grounds, parks for children as laid down by the Town and Country Planning Department, diversion of public park for building constructions in violation of Article 21, 48 (A) and Article 51 (g) of the Constitution of India. It is further alleged that open spaces are mandatory environmental safeguard, which are essential to be maintained as a green area or green belt and further construction of multi story buildings damaging the park and green belt area may cause environmental damage to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
