NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, Chairperson, ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, Judicial Member, A. SENTHIL VEL, Expert Member
BALBIR SANDHU – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant challenges mining plan approvals violating dsr. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. mining plans exceed dsr mineral capacity and area limits. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. joint committee identifies dsr discrepancies; mining restrained. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. respondents defend approvals citing dsr errors and revisions. (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. tribunal frames issues on limitation, locus, affidavits, violations. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. delay condoned; application within limitation. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 7. applicant has locus standi in environmental public interest. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 8. procedural affidavit irregularities overlooked. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 9. approvals violate dsr, notifications, guidelines. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 10. unregulated mining causes severe riverine ecological damage. (Para 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 11. eia notifications mandate prior ec for minor minerals. (Para 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 12. deepak kumar mandates ec for all minor mineral mining. (Para 63 , 64) |
| 13. dsr preparation ensures sustainable mining zones. (Para 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74) |
| 14. |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.