SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3055

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Anil Mehta – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Execution Application No.04/2024(CZ)|O.A.No.102/2022(CZ)|(I.A.No.50/2024)



Advocates:
For the Applicant(s): Mr. Maitreya Prithwiraj Ghorpade, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Archita Yadav, Adv., Ms. Prachi Mishra, Adv.

Wetland rules apply to non-notified lakes in national inventory per Supreme Court directive; noise pollution enforced via specific complaints to authorities; execution disposed on compliance reports, permitting FIRs for violations.

Headnote:(A) Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017 - Rule 4 - Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 - Execution application seeking enforcement of Tribunal's order directing application of wetland protections and eco-sensitive zone restrictions to lake and its zone of influence - Lake included in national wetland inventory per Supreme Court directive mandating Rule 4 protections even for non-notified wetlands - Restrictions on conversion, industries, waste dumping, effluents, permanent construction, poaching to apply - Portions within eco-sensitive zone of wildlife sanctuary attract corresponding prohibitions - Noise pollution violations during night hours from processions, loudspeakers, firecrackers in hotels and zone of influence to be prohibited - No specific noise standards for wetlands; violations actionable under existing rules upon complaint exceeding 10 dB over limits - Light pollution requires study by Ministries - Joint Committee recommendations for noise monitoring, grievance app, display boards, bans on DJ systems, CCTV to be implemented - Compliance reports filed; execution application disposed permitting future complaints/FIRs to authorities/police. (Paras 1-14)

(B) Environmental Compliance - Execution Proceedings - State Wetland Authority and pollution control authorities responsible for enforcing wetland rules and eco-sensitive prohibitions - Noise enforcement by designated authorities (District Magistrate, Police) on specific complaints; general directions inappropriate without identified violators - Post-compliance monitoring data showing reduced noise levels; aggrieved parties to file FIRs under pollution laws if violations persist. (Paras 3-13)

Facts of the case:
Execution application alleging non-compliance with Tribunal's order on wetland protections, noise pollution control, and eco-sensitive zone restrictions around lake and zone of influence. Respondents filed compliance reports detailing noise monitoring, notices to hotels, installation of meters/display boards, and ongoing enforcement measures per rules.

Findings of Court:
Order dated 31.07.2023 complied with; restrictions under Rule 4 extended to lake and zone of influence; noise violations addressable via complaints to authorities; future violations to be pursued through FIRs and designated forums.

Issues: Whether wetland rules apply to non-notified lake in national inventory; enforcement of eco-sensitive prohibitions; noise pollution control absent specific wetland standards; light pollution regulation; compliance with Joint Committee recommendations.

Ratio Decidendi: Supreme Court directive binds states to apply Rule 4 protections to inventoried wetlands regardless of notification; eco-sensitive zones impose strict prohibitions; noise rules enforced on complaint basis by competent authorities without general mandates against unidentified violators; execution closed on reported compliance, with liberty for specific actions.

Result: Execution Application No.04/2024 disposed of.

Table of Content
1. light pollution requires moef&cc study. (Para 1)
2. execution application for enforcing prior wetland order. (Para 2)
3. joint committee recommendations for noise mitigation implemented. (Para 3)
4. noise complaints via fir; execution application disposed. (Para 4 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. no specific noise standards for wetlands; general rules apply. (Para 7)

ORDER

1. This is an application enforce and execute the order dated 31.07.2023 passed in O.A. No. 102/2022(CZ). The issue raised in this original application was with regard to noise pollution and protection of Fateh Sagar lake in accordance with the wetland rules. This Tribunal vide order dated 31.07.2023 directed the authority is as follows:-

1. “First question up for consideration is “whether Fatehsagar lake is a wetland to which Rule 4 of Wetland Rule 2017, is applicable”. It is not denied by respondents that ‘Fatehsagar lake’ is included in National Wetland Inventory and Assessment project by MoEF&CC whereby it has identified 201503 wetlands Supreme Court in the order dated 08.02.2017 in M.K. Balakrishnan & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors., Writ Petition (Civil) No.230 of 2001 has said:

“Accordingly, we direct the application of the principles of Rule 4 of the Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2010 to these 2,01,503 wetlands that have been mapped by the Union of India. The Union of India will identify and inventorize all these 2,01,503 wetlands with the assistance of the State Governments and will also communicate our order to the State Governments which will also bind the State Governments to the effect that these identified 2,01,503 wetlands are subject to the principles of Rule 4 of the Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2010.”

2. In view of Supreme Court’s above direction even if ‘Fatehsagar lake’ is not a ‘notified wetland’, it has to be protected by application of Rule 4 of Wetland Rules of 2017.Rule 4 of Wetland Rules 2017 say as under:

“4. Restrictions of activities in wetlands.—

(1) The wetlands shall be conserved and managed in accordance with the principle of ’wise use’ as determined by the Wetlands Authority.

(2) The following activities shall be prohibited within the wetlands, namely,-

(i) conversion for non-wetland uses including encroachment of any kind;

(ii) setting up of any industry and expansion of existing industries;

(iii) manufacture or handling or storage or disposal of construction and demolition waste covered under the Construction and Demolition Waste Management Rules, 2016; hazardous substances covered under the Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemical Rules, 1989 or the Rules for Manufacture, Use, Import, Export and Storage of Hazardous Micro-organisms Genetically engineered organisms or cells, 1989 or the Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008; electronic waste covered under the E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2016;

(iv) solid waste dumping;

(v) discharge of untreated wastes and effluents from industries, cities, towns, villages and other human settlements;

(vi) any construction of a permanent nature except for boat jetties within fifty metres from the mean high flood level observed in the past ten years calculated from the date of commencement of these rules; and,

(vii) poaching.

Provided that the Central Government may consider proposals from the State Government or Union Territory Administration for omitting any of the activities on the recommendation of the Authority.”

3. The restrictions of activities in wetlands and protection provided in Rule 4 has to be extended to ‘Fatehsagar lake’ and its ‘Zone of Influence’ area. It is the responsibility of Rajasthan State Wetland Authority i.e. respondent 4 to take appropriate action in the matter and do the needful. First question is answered accordingly.

4. The second question is, “whether partially ‘Zone of Influence’of Fatehsagar lake including lake area falls within the notified area of Eco Sensitive Zone o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top