SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3165

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Ratneshwar Jan Kalyan Samiti – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttrakhand – Respondent
Original Application No. 54/2023 (IA No. 130/2024)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Rahul Khurana
For the Respondents: Himanshu Pal, Himanshu Khurana, Mukesh Verma, Sanjay Upadhyay, Rohan Talwar, Anirudh Bhatia, Mansi Bachani, Gitanjali Sanyal

Private wetlands exceeding 2 hectares must comply with conservation rules irrespective of ownership; status quo preservation and monitoring mandated.

Headnote:(A) National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Sections 14 and 15 - Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017 - Rule 4 - Environmental protection - Private lake exceeding 2 hectares qualifies as water-body/wetland subject to regulatory restrictions irrespective of private ownership - Status quo to be maintained with strict compliance of Rule 4 - Periodic monitoring by State Wetland Authority and Pollution Control Board mandated. (Paras 11, 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
Application filed alleging reduction in extent of private lake, illegal tree felling, encroachments and degradation. Joint Committee verified facts through revenue records, GPS mapping and site inspection, confirming private ownership, minor shrinkage of 0.116 hectares, excessive aquatic vegetation, lack of maintenance, unauthorized constructions nearby, solid waste, cattle grazing but no recent illegal tree cutting or tea cultivation.

Findings of Court:
Lake recognized as wetland >2 hectares; private ownership immaterial for environmental protection obligations; parties directed to preserve status quo per Wetland Rules; monitoring entrusted to concerned authorities.

Issues: Whether private lake qualifies for wetland protection; appropriate remedial measures post committee verification; compliance monitoring mechanism.

Ratio Decidendi: Water-bodies exceeding 2 hectares, even privately owned, must maintain wetland status with Rule 4 restrictions strictly observed; disposal with consent directing status quo preservation and periodic oversight. (Paras 11, 12)

Result: Original Application disposed with directions.

ORDER

1. Heard Mr. Himanshu Pal, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3 along with Mr. Himanshu Khurana, DM, Chamoli (through VC) Mr. Mukesh Verma, Advocate for respondent no.4 (through VC) Mr. Sanjay Upadhyay, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohan Talwar, Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Ms. Mansi Bachani and Ms. Gitanjali Sanyal, Advocates for respondents no.5 and 6.

2. This original application under Sections 14 and 15 of National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NGT Act, 2010’) has been filed by Ratneshwar Jan Kalyan Samiti, a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, stating that there is a lake namely Benital Lake in district Chamoli, State of Uttarakhand. It is catering needs of watersheds to many villages and, also called as “Benital-Palgad watershed”. The extent of Benital Lake has reduced in past sometime and standing trees on side of lake have been cut illegally, therefore, a Committee should be constituted to investigate the matter with the help of satellite image and to submit its report to protect Benital Lake from degradation and direction be issued to respondents to place a time bound action plan to restore Benital Lake to its natural and enriched state.

3. Further directions are sought from this Tribunal to respondent 5 and 6 restraining them from altering nature and status of Benital Lake and disturbing its natural status.

4. Tribunal considered grievances on 14.02.2023, and found it appropriate to constitute a Joint Committee comprising representative of Chief Secretary, Government of Uttarakhand, Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (HoFF), Government of Uttarakhand, Uttarakhand State Pollution Control Board and District Magistrate, Chamoli, so as to get the facts verified.

5. The said Committee was directed to look into the grievance of applicant, verify factual position regarding the extent and catchment area of lake with the help of revenue record and satellite images and suggest appropriate remedial action for removal of encroachments and restoration of catchment area to protect Benital Lake from degradation.

6. Pursuant to order dated 14.02.2023, Additional District Magistrate, Chamoli submitted a report dated 15.04.2023, giving details of certain constructions near lake and also position of trees, in the form of two separate charts as under:

English Translation by Tribunal:

Description of trees established around Benital Lake

Sr. No.SpeciesDiameter Square (cm)GPS LocationRemarks
12345
1-Majnu30-40N-30°16’17” E 79°24’53”Broken / Fallen
2-Majnu60-70N-30°16’54” E 79°20’57”Broken / Dry
3-Majnu40-50N-30°16’49” E 79°24’5.85”Healthy
4-Majnu20-30N-30°16’12” E 79°24’6.29”Healthy
5-Majnu30-40N-30°16’10.6” E 79°29’34”Healthy but hanging
6-Majnu10-20N-30°16’00” E 79°24’6.36”Healthy
7-Mamora10-20N-30°16’78” E 79°24’7.19”Healthy
8-Mehal40-50N-30°19’1.17” E 79°14’40.7”Healthy
9-Mehal20-30N-30°09’04.4” E 79°14’41.2”Healthy

Description of the structures established around Benital Lake

Sr. No.Name of Building OwnerNo. / Type of StructuresArea (Approx.) Sq. metersRemarks
12345
1-Sh. Rajiv Sareen S/o Sh. PremnathAadi04281.19House / Toilet
2-Sh. Vinod Singh S/o Sh. Balwant Singh0362.35House / Cow Shed / Toilet
3-Sh. Chatar Singh S/o Sh. Balwant Singh01115.42House / Cow Shed / Toilet
4-Sh. Birender Singh S/o Sh. Amar Singh05135.43House / Cow Shed / Toilet
5-Old Nandadevi Temple0172.96Temple / Courtyard
6-Water Tank013.06Water Tank
य र् :-15670.41

7. Joint Committee, however, submitted its Report dated 27.04.2023, stating that Benital is a village where in Khatoni Khata No.1, Khasra No.71, area 2.006 hectare is recorded in the category of transferrable Bhumidar in the name of Sh. Rajiv Sarin, Ajit Sarin sons of Premanath, Aditya Sarin son of Rajiv Sarin in Fasli year 1427- 1432. In Khasra No.73 and 74, in village Randoli, Tehsil Aadibadri, District Chamoli, some constructions have been raised by Birender Singh, Vinod Singh, Chatar Singh and Pradeep Singh without any permission from concerned authority. It is also stated that in Khat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top