SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3287

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, A Senthil Vel, Expert Member
IN RE NEW PAPER ARTICLE PUBLISHED IN DAINIK BHASKAR DAILY DATED 24TH SEPTEMBER 2023 BHOPAL EDITION REPORTED BY MR MANISH KUSHWAHA REGARDING ILLEGAL MINING IN VIDISHA MADHYA PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY – Respondent
Original Application No. 117/2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: None
For the Respondents: Mr. Mehul Bhardwaj, Mr. Gaurvanvit Jain

ECs for minor mineral mining granted by DEIAA are void ab initio without SEIAA re-appraisal per Supreme Court/NGT directives; illegal mining mandates CPCB-based environmental compensation and strict enforcement.

Headnote:(A) Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Environmental Clearance for minor mineral mining - Supreme Court judgment in Deepak Kumar vs. State of Haryana (2012) 4 SCC 629 and NGT orders in Satendra Pandey (OA 186/2016) and others - Notification dated 15.01.2016 delegating EC powers to DEIAA held inconsistent with mandate requiring EIA/EMP/Public Consultation for areas 5-25 ha and expertise of SEIAA - All ECs granted by DEIAA declared void ab initio, non-operational, and requiring re-appraisal by SEIAA - Mining impermissible without fresh EC from SEIAA; non-compliance with Sustainable Sand Mining Management Guidelines, 2016 and Enforcement & Monitoring Guidelines, 2020. (Paras 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)

(B) Illegal mining in forest area - Use of heavy machinery, blasting causing environmental damage, forest loss, and structural harm - State directed to impose environmental compensation at Rs.5000/day minimum per CPCB parameters (Rs.97,35,000/- over 1947 days across 151 cases), recover from violators, seize vehicles, ensure 24x7 surveillance, drone monitoring, and ban heavy blasting. (Paras 3, 14, 15)

(C) Forest protection - DFO recommendation for de-notification of forest land rejected as contrary to policy; strict action mandated against illegal activities including tree felling. (Para 3iv)

Facts of the case:
Application based on newspaper report alleging illegal mining by mafia using heavy machines in forest area, selling mining rights privately, operating 100 trucks daily (value >240 crores annually), damaging forest, causing temple wall cracks from blasting, despite Supreme Court/NGT directions; committee found 13+ illegal pits, 5-year operations without EC, low-intensity blasting.

Findings of Court:
ECs by DEIAA void; illegal mining confirmed with seizures (44 tractors, 42 trollies, 20 trucks, etc.) and penalties (Rs.5,82,916/-); environmental compensation of Rs.97,35,000/- calculated and directed for recovery; ongoing monitoring, compliance with SSMG 2016/EMGSM 2020 mandated.

Issues: Validity of DEIAA-granted ECs post-2018 NGT orders; control of illegal mining, environmental compensation, forest protection, compliance with Supreme Court/NGT guidelines.

Ratio Decidendi: DEIAA lacks expertise for EC assessment per Supreme Court; ECs issued thereunder unenforceable without SEIAA re-appraisal; precautionary principle mandates EIA/EMP even for smaller leases; collective impact of clustered mining requires comprehensive study; state must rigorously enforce anti-illegal mining measures and compensate environmental damage per CPCB norms.

Result: Original Application disposed of with directions for EC re-appraisal by SEIAA, recovery of environmental compensation, intensified action against illegal mining, and compliance reports.

Table of Content
1. illegal mining causing environmental and financial loss. (Para 1 , 2)
2. state actions and seizures against illegal mining. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. deiaa ecs invalid; require seiaa re-appraisal. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. impose environmental compensation per cpcb guidelines. (Para 13 , 14)

ORDER

1. Issues raised in this application are :-

i. that land for mining is being sold in a private capacity by sand mafia for a certain amount and approximately 100 trucks are being transported from this place to other places and are sold for financial gain, causing loss to the environment, loss to the State exchequer and in this way mining of more than 240 crores annually is being done damaging the forest area.

ii. that the old Neel Kanteshwar Temple is situated near the explosion site and the walls are cracking due to high explosions. The mining area is being sold from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 04 lakh for illegal mining by sand mafias with security guarantee and that despite repeated direction issued by the Hon’ble the Supreme Court of India and this Tribunal, the District Administration of Vidisha has failed to control the illegal mining in District Vidisha, Ganjbasauda, Tehsil in the Villages Udaipur, Pathari, Ghatera, Pathari, Noorpur, situated 120 km from the State Capital Bhopal. It is reported that there are various illegal mining activities in the forest area and more than 500 illegal mining are being done within the area of 5 km by use of heavy machines by sand mafias.

2. The matter was taken up by this Tribunal on 25.09.2023 and a committee was constituted to submit the report with regard to the following points :-

i. Number of minings sanctioned by the authorities with consent conditions and EC as required.

ii. Number of illegal minings with details of violators involved in the process of illegal mining.

iii. Mining excavated by illegal mining mafia, the value.

iv. Status of DPR and the replenishment study of area.

v. Loss of the forest area and plantation.

vi. Environmental compensation against each violator in accordance with the parameter laid down by the CPCB and this Tribunal.

vii. Number of transport vehicle seized or action taken by the state authorities.

3. The committee visited the site and submitted following illegalities :-

i. The illegal mining is being continued for last five years through use of tractor, trolleys, trucks, poclain, JCB Machines, Motorcycle, blasting equipments, compressors, diesel engines and other instruments. More than 13 mines were operating without any valid environmental clearance within the forest area.

ii. The forest area under question is very vast and not properly accessible except two sites located along the road side. Approximately seven illegal mining pits were found near the road side in the forest land.

iii. Low intensity blasting is generally preferred by the violators.

iv. Instead of control of illegal mining, cutting of the trees and protection of the forest area the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Department District Vidisha has recommended and suggested for de-notifying the forest land, which is against the policy of the forest and against the departmental rules. It is surprising that the DFO is recommending for deforestation of already notified area when the responsibility to protect the forest land is with DFO concerned.

4. Vide order dated 11.03.2024 Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and Principal Secretary, Mining was directed to take action and submit the report. In compliance thereof, the Divisional Forest Officer filed the reply with the facts that :-

i. That barriers have been erected at Ghatera and Udaipur, with forest personnel deployed for continuous 24x7 surveillance and furthermore forest guards engage in day and night patrols within the forest range to thwart illegal mining activities, augmented by monitoring through drone cameras.

ii. That over the past five years (January 2019 to September 2023), the forest staff, in the course of range patrolling, have taken

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top