SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3357

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL KOLKATA (EASTERN ZONE BENCH)
B. Amit Sthalekar, Judicial Member, Satyagopal Korlapati, Expert Member
Karunath Pazing – Appellant
Versus
Arunachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board – Respondent
Original Application No.10/2024/EZ



Advocates:
For the Applicant(s)/Petitioners: None
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Surendra Kumar, Mr. Ashok Prasad, Ms. Amrita Pandey, Mr. Vikas Baisya

Stone crushing units must strictly comply with minimum 5 km distance from reserve forests per guidelines; operations in violation illegal, with officials liable for departmental proceedings and environmental compensation recovery.

Headnote:(A) Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Schedule-I - Stone crushing units categorized under ‘Orange’ category - Must obtain Consent to Establish and Consent to Operate from State Pollution Control Board - Operation without required permissions and in violation of siting guidelines constitutes illegal activity. (Paras 7, 28)

(B) Arunachal Pradesh Stone Crusher Guidelines, 2012 - Para 6.1(d) - Minimum distance criteria mandates stone crusher units be located at least 5 km from wildlife sanctuary/reserve forest or buffer zone - Location less than 500 meters from reserve forest boundary renders unit non-compliant. (Paras 20-25)

(C) Environmental compliance - Issuance of No Objection Certificates despite violations - Deliberate omission of crucial distance information from reserve forest in official documents amounts to misconduct warranting departmental proceedings - Environmental Compensation to be determined and recovered from erring officials for site restoration and afforestation. (Paras 27-32)

Facts of the case:
Applicant alleged operation of stone crushing unit without necessary permissions, violating environmental guidelines including proximity to national highway, human habitation, and reserve forest. Unit received initial NOCs and consents, later some cancelled due to non-renewal and location violations. Conflicting reports on distance from reserve forest; final clarification confirmed unit within 500 meters of reserve forest boundary.

Findings of Court:
Stone crushing unit located less than 500 meters from reserve forest, violating guidelines. Initial permissions issued erroneously with deliberate concealment. Unit directed to cease operations and be removed. Departmental proceedings against responsible officials ordered. Environmental Compensation to be calculated by Pollution Control Board, recovered from officials, and used for site restoration and afforestation.

Issues: Whether stone crushing unit complies with minimum distance criteria from reserve forest; validity of permissions issued despite violations; accountability of officials for erroneous NOCs and omissions.

Ratio Decidendi: Operation of stone crusher within prohibited distance from reserve forest illegal irrespective of prior permissions; officials issuing NOCs in violation of notified guidelines liable for departmental action and liability for environmental damage compensation. Appellate insistence on full compliance with all siting criteria essential.

Result: Original Application disposed of with directions for unit removal, departmental proceedings, Environmental Compensation determination and recovery.

Table of Content
1. procedural hearing and absence noted. (Para 1 , 2)
2. alleged illegal stone crushing operations. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. pollution board confirms violations. (Para 6 , 7 , 11)
4. forest noc issued then cancelled. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 23 , 24)
5. respondent denies proximity to forests. (Para 12 , 13 , 17 , 18 , 19)
6. 5km minimum from reserve forest required. (Para 20 , 21)
7. official lapses in noc issuance. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)
8. unit closure and departmental actions. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)

ORDER

1. The allegation of the Applicant in the present Original Application is that the Respondent No.13, M/s Balaji Minerals, is carrying on illegal operation of Stone Crushing Unit near Siku River Bridge under Mebo Circle, District-East Siang, without necessary permissions from the Government authorities and in violation of the environmental guidelines.

2. It is stated that No Objection Certificate (‘NOC’ for short) was granted on 14.02.2023 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Pasighat Forest Division, Pasighat, but the same was subsequently cancelled on 06.11.2023 by the same officer. It is also stated that the Consent to Establish/Consent to Operate order has been granted by the Arunachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board vide certificate dated 25.06.2021.

3. The allegation further is that the said Stone Crusher Unit of Respondent No.13 is located 300 meters from the National Highway and 400 meters from the Siku Notko Resort whereas as per environmental guidelines it should be installed at a distance of at least one kilometer from the National Highway and half a kilometer from human habitation.

4. It is also alleged that as of today, there is no Forest Clearance from the Forest Division. The pollution control measures i.e. dust containment-cum-suppression system for the equipment, construction of wind breaking walls, regular cleaning and wetting of the ground within the premises and greenbelt along the periphery, have not been installed by the Respondent No.13.

5. It is also stated that the Applicant has submitted representation before the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Mebo, East Siang District, as well as the District Forest Officer (T), Pasighat Forest Division, and the Assistant Mineral Development Officer, Pasighat, on 31.10.20223 (page 28 of the paper book), but no order has been passed till date.

6. The Arunachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board, Respondent No.1, has filed affidavit dated 18.03.2024 and it is stated that the NOC has been issued by the Assistant Mineral Development Officer (ADMO), Department of Geology & Mining, East Siang District, vide letter dated 23.06.2021 (page 101 of paper book) as the Respondent No.13 Stone Crushing Unit is at a distance of about 300 meters from the National Highway/State road. Along with the affidavit, photographs have also been filed showing the premises of the Respondent No.13, Project Proponent, which confirms stone crushing activity of the Respondent No.13.

7. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Respondent No.4, in its affidavit of 09.04.2024 has stated that stone crushing units should operate only after obtaining Consent to Establish (CTE) and Consent to Operate (CTO) from the concerned State Pollution Control Boards/Pollution Control Committees. It is also stated that the stone crushing units fall under Schedule-I of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, and are categorized under ‘Orange’ category vide Central Pollution Control Board order dated 07.03.2016 with a Pollution Index Score of 41 to 59 in a Pollution Index Range from 0 to 100.

8. The Deputy Conservator of Forests (Conservation), Department of Environment, Government of Arunachal Pradesh, has filed affidavit dated 15.07.2024 on behalf of the Respondent No.2, stating therein that the NOC dated 14.02.2023 of the Stone Crusher Unit of Respondent No.13 was issued by the Divisional Forest Officer, Pasighat, as per the application of the Respondent No.13 on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top