NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL KOLKATA (EASTERN ZONE BENCH)
B. Amit Sthalekar, Judicial Member, Arun Kumar Verma, Expert Member
Prakash Chandra Nayak – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. illegal tree felling on forest land for industrialization (Para 1 , 2 , 6 , 9 , 25 , 26) |
| 2. sabik jungle land requires forest conservation act clearance (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. respondents claim non-forest status and procedural compliance (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. sabik jungle remarks trigger forest act despite hal changes (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 5. later settlement entries presume incorrect without rebuttal (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 6. land held as sabik jungle; halt activity pending clearance (Para 45) |
ORDER
1. The allegation in the Original Application is that the Project Proponent i.e., Respondent No.6 is cutting trees in land which is otherwise forest land by illegal diversion of forest land for the purposes of industrialization. It is stated that 7.5 acres of Sabik Kisam Forest Land is being usurped by Respondent No.6 for the benefit of Respondent No.7 i.e., M/s Western Integrated Waste Management Facility Private Limited which is projected to set up Common Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility (CHWTSDF) at Village- Patamrapada, Teshil-Parja
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.