SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3549

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Gram Panchayat of Bhontawali Village – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Original Application No. 278/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: None
For the Respondents: Mr. Rahul Pratap|Mr. Sushil Jaswal|Mr Vaibhav Srivastava, Ms. Vineeta Tiwari, Mr. Satyajeet Mane, Mr. Atul Parmar|Mr. Anubhav

No relocation of compliant solid waste processing site; prior EC not required for standalone facilities except landfills; Pollution Control Board to monitor monthly and enforce compliance with environmental compensation/prosecution for violations. (28 words)

Headnote:(A) Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 - Siting criteria - Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 - Prior environmental clearance - Garbage dumping site established pursuant to 2003 resolution for 'dumping site' with NOC and authorization from Pollution Control Board prior to EIA Notification - No violation of siting criteria found; standalone processing facilities (except landfills) not requiring prior EC per MoEF&CC OM dated 17.11.2017 - Request for relocation to site 5 kms from residential area and river denied as site complies with distances (300-1500m from river/school/village). Plant now fully operational after delays due to protests. (Paras 20, 27, 48-50)

(B) Environmental compliance - Monitoring and enforcement - Pollution Control Board directed to conduct monthly inspections of operational plant, ensure no violations of environmental norms including SWM Rules, 2016, and take immediate punitive, preventive, remedial actions including environmental compensation and prosecution if violations noted. Municipal Council directed to ensure full compliance; liberty granted to aggrieved persons to seek remedies. (Paras 51-53)

Facts of the case:
Gram Panchayat filed OA against authorities seeking relocation of garbage dumping site established by Municipal Council, alleging violations including no prior EC, proximity to river (100m) and village causing health hazards, foul smell, pollution; site originally allotted in 2003 for 'dumping site' not bio-gas plant as claimed; dumping started 2021, stopped due to protests; legacy waste cleared; plant partially functional with composting, baling but lacking mechanization; joint inspections noted deficiencies; outsourced processing; environmental compensation imposed and deposited.

Findings of Court:
No siting violation; plant fully operational; continued monitoring required; no relocation ordered.

Issues: Whether dumping site violates siting criteria/SWM Rules, 2016 requiring relocation; need for prior EC; compliance status and remedial directions.

Ratio Decidendi: Siting complies with SWM Rules, 2016; no EC needed for processing facilities per OM; operational plant to be monitored monthly by PCB for compliance, violations attracting compensation/prosecution; relocation not warranted absent violation.

Result: OA disposed of with directions for monitoring and compliance.

Table of Content
1. factual background of garbage dumping complaint. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. respondents' defenses on land allotment and delays. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
3. hpspcb inspections and swm compliance issues. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
4. ongoing site development and partial operations. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
5. joint inspections reveal ec and facility deficiencies. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43)
6. recent actions on recommendations and outsourcing. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47)
7. plant operational; monitoring and compliance directed. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54)

ORDER

1. This Original Application (hereinafter referred to as ‘OA’) has been called in revise but none has appeared for the applicant.

2. Mr. Rahul Pratap, Advocate for MoEF&CC, Mr. Sushil Jaswal, Advocate for MC, Ponta Sahib, Mr. Vaibhav Srivastava for HPPCB and Mr. Anubhav, Advocate for Respondent No. 5 & 6 are present for respondents.

3. The Court Master informs that twice he tried to contact Counsel for applicant but he has not received any response. In the circumstances, we proceed to hear Counsel for respondents and decide the matter on the basis of record and submissions advanced by Learned Counsel appearing for respondents.

4. OA has been brought before us through Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Gram Pradhan of Village Bhontawali, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh with the prayer that a garbage dumping site established by Municipal Council, Ponta Sahib be directed to be shifted to some other place which should be atleast 5 kms away from residential area as well as river Yamuna. Respondent authorities be further directed to take appropriate action against respondent no. 2 i.e. Municipal Council, Ponta Sahib for establishing the said dumping site in disputed area without seeking any prior environmental clearance and in violation of conditions mentioned in Environmental Clearance, if granted, and also to impose damages/compensation upon violators.

5. The brief facts stated in the OA are that at Khasra No. 385/169 measuring 5 Bigha Muhal, in Revenue Estate of Village Kedarpur, Tehsil Ponta Sahib, District Sirmaur, a garbage dumping site (waste dumping site) has been raised in utter violation of the Rules applicable for establishing dumping site or land filling site. The concerned respondent is throwing/dumping and accumulating garbage of entire Sirmaur District i.e. garbage collected from homes, factories, hospitals, clinics, markets meat shops, chemical industries etc. and this garbage is causing health hazards to local resident of village Bhontawali.

6. Initially, a ‘No Objection’ Certificate was obtained by Municipal Council, Paonta Sahib from Gram Panchayat, Bhontawali in August, 2003 for establishing a bio-gas plant for use and benefit of villagers. Thereafter, nothing was done at site in question upto November, 2021 except taking measurement and construction of boundary wall. Even electricity connection was not obtained by Municipal Council, Paonta Sahib.

7. In the garb of installation of bio-gas plant, Municipal Council, Paonta Sahib started throwing and dumping hazardous garbage in the month of November, 2021 when garbage carrying vehicles started moving in area creating a heap of garbage at the above site.

8. This was beyond imagination of villagers who were under the impression that a bio-gas plant for benefit of villagers shall be established at the site in question. Entire route of vehicle, carrying garbage is through forest which has been re-routed on complaint made by villagers to Forest Department that vehicles moving through forest are causing pollution therein. Presently, vehicles loaded with garbage are passing through thick lanes of village causing pollution in habitable area of village Bhontawali. The dumping site is just 100 mtrs. away from river Yamuna bed and during rainy season, the level of Yamuna raises submerging the dumping site, as a result the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top