SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3606

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Arun Kumar Tyagi, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Bhushan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Government of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
Original Application No. 522/2022



Advocates:
For the Applicant: None
For the Respondents: Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Ms. Ananya Basudha, Mr. Virendra Singh, Mr. Kush Sharma, Mr. Chhaju Ram, Mr. Gi. Gi.C. George

Set aside duplicative environmental penalty lacking hearing in mixed land use scrap operations post violation cessation; closure direction infructuous on obtaining license; compensation for afforestation.

Headnote:(A) National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Schedule I - Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 - Section 31A - Environmental pollution - Illegal scrap operations including segregation, cutting, welding and burning of wires in mixed land use area - Joint Committee inspection revealed violations, leading to environmental compensation of Rs.40,000/- imposed by pollution control committee for past violations, deposited by project proponent - Direction for unit closure issued to municipal corporation held infructuous post cessation of polluting activities (welding stopped January 2023) and obtaining valid trade license for scrap shop in mixed land use area - Penalty of Rs.1,00,000/- imposed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate set aside as lacking opportunity of hearing, duplicative of earlier compensation, and inapplicable to licensed operations in mixed land use (Paras 25-31)

(B) Principles of natural justice - Opportunity of hearing mandatory before imposing environmental compensation/penalty - Notices under CrPC Section 133 not substitute for hearing on penalty imposition - Double jeopardy avoided by not imposing compensation twice for same violations (Para 31)

(C) Environmental compensation - Utilisation - Directions for transfer to municipal corporation for compensatory afforestation (tree plantation) in nearby park, with action taken report (Paras 33-34)

Facts of the case:
Letter petition treated as original application complaining of illegal scrap unit with welding and wire burning causing noise/air pollution in residential area. Joint Committee (pollution control committee and district authorities) inspected, found violations including operations without consent, scrap storage on public/CPWD land, burning residues. Show cause notices issued, compensation levied, unit sealed temporarily, polluting activities ceased, trade license obtained for scrap shop.

Findings of Court:
Polluting activities stopped, operations now licensed scrap shop in mixed land use area; closure direction infructuous; penalty of Rs.1,00,000/- set aside with refund of Rs.10,000/- deposit; Rs.40,000/- compensation to be used for afforestation.

Issues: Legality of scrap operations in mixed land use; validity of closure direction post-compliance; propriety of dual environmental penalties; compliance with natural justice in penalty imposition; utilisation of compensation.

Ratio Decidendi: In mixed land use areas, licensed non-polluting scrap shops permissible post cessation of violations like welding/burning; environmental penalties must follow hearing, avoid duplication; closure directions lapse on compliance; compensation funds directed for remediation like afforestation.

Result: Original application disposed of; penalty set aside with refund; afforestation directions issued to municipal corporation.

Table of Content
1. applicant's complaint of illegal polluting scrap unit. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. joint committee inspection reveals violations and actions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. follow-up reports confirm penalties and compliance. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. directions for ec utilization and status updates. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. court scrutiny of procedural compliance and penalties. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
6. summary of violations and dpcc/mcd actions. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
7. mixed land use permits licensed scrap; quash illegal penalty. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
8. reject counter-claim; direct ec for afforestation. (Para 32 , 33 , 34)
9. application disposed; compliance reports required. (Para 35 , 36 , 37)

JUDGMENT

PRONOUNCED BY: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1. Mr. Bhushan Kumar resident of 14-B/29, Dev Nagar, Pyarelal Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi, has sent the present letter petition, which has been treated and registered as original application.

2. The applicant has complained that illegal scrap unit is being operated in residential area of Dev Nagar, Pyarelal road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. The Project Proponent is also doing iron welding business in the said unit. Grinder, cutter, fire producing instruments cause noise and air pollution in the area. The Project Proponent purchases old copper and silver wires and burns them under the trees for extraction of metals which causes dense smoke of poisonous gases in the area creating respiratory problems to the inhabitants of the locality and dries up the green trees. On 22.03.2022 the Project Proponent burnt lot of wires which caused dense smoke due to which fire brigade was summoned which doused the fire. The Police also reached but did not take any action.

3. The relevant part of the letter petition enumerating grievances of the applicant is reproduced as under:-

4. Vide order dated 02.09.2024 this Tribunal constituted a Joint Committee with direction to submit its report within one month. The relevant part of the order is reproduced below:-

“...3. Prima facie, the allegations made in the application raise questions relating to environment arising out of the implementation of the enactments specified in Schedule I to the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. In view of the allegations made in the application, we consider it appropriate that a Joint Committee be constituted to verify the factual position. Accordingly, we constitute a Joint Committee comprising of the representative of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) and Deputy Commissioner (Central), Delhi and direct the same to meet within two weeks, undertake visits to the site, look into the grievances of the applicant, associate the applicant and representative of the concerned project proponent, verify the factual position and submit its report within one month by e- mail at judicialngt@gov.in preferably in the form of searchable PDF/OCR Supported PDF and not in the form of Image PDF. The DPCC will be the nodal agency for coordination and compliance.

4. In case the Joint Committee observes any violation of consent conditions/environmental norms then it shall notify these proceedings and forward a copy of its report to:-

(i) the Project Proponent to enable him to comply with the recommendations or file objections against the observations/recommendations in in its report and file his response before this Tribunal as desired within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of its report; and

(ii) the DPCC and Deputy Commissioner (Central), Delhi to enable them to take appropriate remedial action by giving notice to/hearing the project proponent and following due process of law in accordance with Statutory provisions mandating them to take remedial action for prevention, control and abatement of environmental pollution/degradation and protection and improvement of environment and submit their action taken reports within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the report of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top