Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, A Senthil Vel, Expert Member
Pranjal Karera – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prayer for central appraisal of projects in sensitive areas. (Para 1) |
| 2. applicant's contention: gc mandates central appraisal for building projects in cpa/spa. (Para 2 , 11 , 12 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 27) |
| 3. eia 2006 general conditions require category a appraisal within 5km of sensitive zones. (Para 5 , 17) |
| 4. cpcb classifies industries into red/orange/green/white pollution categories. (Para 6) |
| 5. 2014 notification quashed; reverts to original gc applicability. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 6. supreme court mandates clarity on gc application to schedule projects. (Para 8) |
| 7. ngt emphasizes sustainable development and pollution control in cpa. (Para 13) |
| 8. respondents: state appraisal valid; no difference in eac/seac expertise. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 33) |
| 9. central eacs have superior sectoral expertise for high-impact projects. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 38 , 39) |
| 10. pcbs not involved in ec granting process. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 11. post-quashing, gc applies; central appraisal required for sensitive projects. (Para 40) |
| 12. directions to moef&cc for strict gc enforcement and clarification. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
ORDER
1. The present application has been filed with the prayer for i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
