SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3658

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Davinder Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Original Application No. 434/2023



For the Appellants/Petitioners: None
For the Respondents:Mr. Sanchar Anand with Mr. Aaditya Dachalwal, Commissioner MC Patiala|Mr. Naginder Benipal and Mr. Ankit Siwach, Advocates for PPCB (through VC)

Tribunal mandates time-bound compliance by municipal bodies with SWM Rules for legacy waste remediation, fire prevention at dumpsites, and daily waste processing, imposing environmental compensation for violations.

Headnote:(A) Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Section 5 - Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 - Fires at solid waste dump sites - Violation by municipal corporation through open burning, bulk waste burning at landfill, non-compliance with remediation timelines, and inadequate fire prevention - Tribunal exercises suo-moto jurisdiction on complaint of regular fires causing harm to inhabitants and environment - Joint Committee constituted to report on compliance, legacy waste remediation, risk assessment, emergency plans, methane monitoring, fencing, CCTV, leachate treatment - Environmental compensation imposed for non-compliance, with balance payment directed - CPCB directions mandated for interim fire prevention measures including waste segregation, gas detectors, fire extinguishers, mock drills, avoiding water for dousing. (Paras 2, 3, 5-12, 15)

(B) Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 - Legacy waste bioremediation - Duty on local bodies to process daily waste generation, remediate legacy dumps, close processing gaps - Tribunal directs time-bound compliance for risk assessment studies, on-site/off-site emergency plans, installation of hydrants, detectors, weighbridge, fencing, plantation, piezometers, operational ETP, authorization - Fresh tenders for remediation where prior contractor delayed; daily waste shortfall to be addressed by new plants. (Paras 10-13, 19-22)

Facts of the case:
Suo-moto Original Application initiated on letter complaint alleging violations of SWM Rules, 2016 by municipal corporation at old dump site with regular fires from methane and heat, affecting nearby residents; 8-acre site with partial remediation of legacy waste (95% of original), but ongoing dumping of fresh waste, non-functional ETP, inadequate safety measures; daily generation exceeds processing capacity; Joint Committee and PPCB reports detail deficiencies and partial compliances.

Findings of Court:
Municipal corporation to complete bioremediation of remaining legacy waste, achieve full daily waste processing, implement all Joint Committee/PPCB recommendations including emergency plans, infrastructure by 31.12.2024; submit compliance report by 15.01.2025; balance environmental compensation deposited.

Issues: Compliance with SWM Rules for dump site fires, legacy waste remediation, daily waste processing gap, fire prevention infrastructure, environmental compensation payment.

Ratio Decidendi: Local authorities must ensure strict adherence to SWM Rules through time-bound remediation, risk mitigation, and infrastructure; Tribunal monitors via reports and directs closure upon satisfactory compliance undertakings.

Result: Original Application disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. suo-moto oa on mcp waste burning violations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. prior directions and cpcb/ppcb enforcement actions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. joint committee site observations and recommendations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. responses detailing mcp compliance efforts. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. waste processing gaps and remediation timelines. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
6. directions for completion by 31.12.2024. (Para 23 , 24)

ORDER

1. This Original Application (hereinafter referred to as ‘OA’) was registered in exercise of suo-moto jurisdiction in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in (2022) 13 SCC 401 in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Ankita Singha & Ors. on a letter petition dated 31.03.2023 sent by Davinder Pal Singh, R/o H. No. 94, New Officers Colony, Patiala.

2. Complainant has said that Municipal Corporation, Patiala (hereinafter referred to as ‘MCP’) is violating provisions of Solid Waste Management Rule, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‘SWM Rules, 2016’ and orders passed by this Tribunal whereby ban has been imposed on burning of solid waste in open places and bulk waste burning in landfill sites. Moreover, regular fires at Municipal Corporation garbage dump site near Choti Nadi is playing havoc with lives of inhabitants of adjoining colonies and damaging environment.

3. Taking cognizance of complaint on 01.08.2023, Tribunal found it appropriate to constitute a Joint Committee comprising Central Pollution Control Board (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPCB’), Punjab State Pollution Control Board (hereinafter referred to as ‘PPCB’), District Magistrate, Patiala and a representative of Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Patiala to submit a factual report.

4. Committee was required to submit its report within one month.

5. Pursuant thereto, an action taken report was submitted by Member Secretary, PPCB vide letter dated 12.10.2023, sent vide email dated 05.11.2023. Report refers to other O.As i.e. O.A No. 286/2022, In re: News item published in The Indian Express dated 20th April, 2022, titled “7 Charred to death in fire near Ludhiana dumpsite” and O.A No. 288/2022, In re : News item published in News 18 dated 26.04.2022 titled “Delhi: Massive Fire at Bhalswa Dump Yard, Fourth This Year; 13 Fire Tenders on Spot” wherein issue of fire at solid waste dump sites at Ludhiana and Gazipur, respectively, was raised. It was pointed out that CPCB issued letter dated 26.05.2022 containing directions under Section 5 of Environment Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as ‘EP Act, 1986’) for implementation of SWM Rules, 2016 with respect of fire incidents at Municipal Solid Waste dump site, to various State Pollution Control Boards. Report also refers to directions issued by Tribunal in O.A 606/2022 and stated that environmental compensation of Rs. 21 lakhs for the period of 01.07.2020-28.02.2022 was imposed upon MCP for non- compliance of SWM Rules, 2016 and legacy waste remediation. State Government on behalf of MCP deposited only Rs. 09 lakhs towards environmental compensation against Rs. 21 lakhs.

6. Aaditya Dachalwal, Commissioner MC Patiala who is present in Tribunal stated today that even the remaining amount of environmental compensation has been deposited.

7. Report further said that CPCB directions dated 26.05.2022 were forwarded to Department of Local Government, State of Punjab vide PPCB letter dated 19.07.2022 to ensure compliance of said directions. Directions issued by CPCB read as under:-

“1. The Department of Local Government shall provide updated information w.r.t directions dated 01.03.2021 issued by PPCB regarding bio-mining issued to it. It is to be ensured that Updated information w.r.t at least all Metro cities is provided in accordance with Hon'ble NGT Directions.

2. The Department of Local Government to conduct comprehensive risk assessment studies and accordingly prepare detailed On-site Emergency Plan for each dumpsite located in their jurisdiction addressing the foll

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top