SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3718

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Ramesh Mahendru – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Original Application No. 479/2023



For the Appellants/Petitioners: None
For the Respondents:Mr. Prakhyat Gargaysa Proxy Counsel for Mr. Divyam Nandrajog, AAG for State of Punjab|Mr. Prashant Manchanda and Ms. Nancy Shah, Advocates for Respondent No. 3 with Mr. Gautam Jain, Commissioner, MC Jalandhar (through VC)|Mr. Naginder Benipal Advocate for PPCB with Mr. Gurjinder Singh Majithia, Member Secretary, PPCB (through VC)

NGT imposes ‘Polluter Pays’ environmental compensation on local body for SWM Rules non-compliance based on legacy waste quantum, directs penalty under EP Act Section 15, emphasizing mandatory remediation despite partial actions.

Headnote:(A) Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 - Rule 15 - Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Section 15 - Non-compliance by local body with duties for waste segregation, collection, processing, legacy waste remediation, leachate treatment, groundwater monitoring, fencing, CCTV, emergency plans - Violation continuing despite directions, reports, prior compensation - Tribunal invokes ‘Polluter Pays’ principle computing environmental compensation on legacy waste quantum @ 0.01 paisa per kg per day for specified period (Para 28). Penalty proceedings directed under Section 15 EP Act (Para 29).

(B) NGT Procedure - Suo motu cognizance on letter petition invoking Supreme Court law on environmental letters as writs - Joint Committee (CPCB, State PCB, District Magistrate) for factual report mandatory (Para 1-4).

Facts of the case:
Suo motu Original Application on letter alleging illegal dumping on flyover causing pollution, odour, health hazards. Joint Committee report revealed 30-year-old dumpsite (16.2 acres, ~15 lakh MT legacy waste), no segregation/transport covers/weighbridge/treatment/fencing/plantation/leachate system/groundwater monitoring/CCTV/emergency plans, groundwater contamination beyond limits, waste in nearby drain, houses adjacent posing fire risk (Para 4). Local body responses showed partial actions, tenders, future plans but substantial gaps in processing capacity vs generation, legacy clearance (Para 6-22).

Findings of Court:
Local body in utter violation of Rule 15 SWM Rules duties (reproduced in Para 26). Legacy waste ~15 lakh MT, daily gap 380 TPD unprocessed. Environmental compensation Rs.2.70 crores for 01.04.2024-31.07.2024 on 15 lakh MT @ 0.01 paisa/kg/day plus prior PCB levies (total ~Rs.4.50 crores, Rs.90 lakhs deposited) recoverable coercively within 2 months (Para 28,30). Penalty under Section 15 EP Act by MoEF&CC Secretary within 1 month (Para 29). Compensation for restoration plan by Joint Committee (DC, State PCB, CPCB) within timelines (Para 31).

Issues: (1) Extent of non-compliance with SWM Rules at dumpsite/flyover; (2) Adequacy of remedial actions/plans; (3) Quantum/direction for environmental compensation/penalty for continuing violations.

Ratio Decidendi: Prolonged non-compliance with mandatory SWM Rules duties by local bodies warrants stringent ‘Polluter Pays’ compensation computed on legacy waste volume/time, recovery measures, penalty proceedings, restoration plans - environmental protection imperative overrides future promises (Paras 25-27).

Result: Original Application disposed with directions for compensation payment, penalty initiation, restoration plan.

Table of Content
1. suo-moto cognizance on garbage pollution complaint (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. joint committee finds dump site violations (Para 4 , 7)
3. initial remedial actions by municipal corporation (Para 5 , 6)
4. environmental compensation for swm non-compliance (Para 8 , 9)
5. tribunal impleads respondents (Para 10 , 11)
6. respondents' compliance reports and directions (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
7. municipal corporation's ongoing action plans (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
8. court analysis of persistent legacy waste (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
9. polluter pays compensation and penalties imposed (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)

ORDER

1. The Original Application was registered in exercise of suo-moto jurisdiction in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Ankita Sinha, (2022) 13SCC 401, on a letter petition dated 17.05.2023, received from Ramesh Mahendru, President, Alfa Mahendru Foundation.

2. The complainant had said that huge garbage has been dumped on the PAP Flyover near Chowgitti Bypass Jalandhar city which is emitting foul smell causing pollution and damaging environment and also creating health hazard situation to the residents.

3. Tribunal took cognizance of the matter on 04.08.2023 and found it appropriate to obtain a Factual Report by constituting a Joint Committee comprising Central Pollution Control Board (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPCB’), Punjab State Pollution Control Board (hereinafter referred to as ‘PSPCB’) and District Magistrate, Jalandhar.

4. Joint Committee submitted its Report dated 02.11.2023 stating that site was visited on 15.10.2023. Its observations in the Report read as under:

a) The dump site falls within the MC limits and is established in an area of about 16.2 acres. The officials of Municipal Corporation, Jalandhar informed that the site is in use for the last about 30 years.

b) The Municipal Corporation, Jalandhar has provided 30 dump trucks and 43 trollies to carry the solid waste to the dump site.

c) At the time of visit about 3 trollies and 03 dump trucks reached the site but none of them was covered.

d) None of the vehicles was compartmentalized. No segregation of waste is being done before sending it to the dump site and no segregation is done at the dump site.

e) No treatment of fresh waste or legacy waste is being carried out. The unsegregated waste received is dumped as such at the site.

f) No weigh bridge has been provided at the dump site to ascertain the waste being received at site.

g) The Municipal Corporation, Jalandhar officials informed that as pera survey carried out in 2019, 08 lacs MT solid waste was present at the dump site and 400-500 MT waste was being received everyday at that time. Considering increase in daily waste generation and accumulation of waste since 2019, the total legacy waste lying at the dump site could be to the tune of 15 lacs MT.

h) No boundary wall or fencing has been provided around the dumpsite and as such waste was found spread outside the dump site on to the road leading to the site.

i) The Kala Sanghian drain passes at around 400 mtr away from the dump site. A lot of waste was found dumped along the bank of Kala Sanghian drain adding to the pollution in the drain.

j) No plantation has been provided around the dump site.

k) No buffer zone has been left by MC Jalandhar around the dumpsite.

l) The piezometers earlier provided for ground water monitoring are buried under the waste and as such sampling of ground water cannot be done. Further, the ground water sampling from piezometers provided near entrance and inside the dump site was earlier carried out by the Board in October 2020 and samples were got analysed from PBTI Lab.

m) As per analysis report, various parameters were found beyond the prescribed limits as tabulated below:

r. No.Parameters Piezometerinside sitePiezometer at entranceMaximum permissible limits as per SWM Rules 2016
1.pH2.136.386.5-8.30
2.TDS32485407500
3.Chloride14991750250
4.Copper0.020.140.05
5.Iron0.43

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top