SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3749

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL KOLKATA (EASTERN ZONE BENCH)
B. Amit Sthalekar, JM, Dr. Arun Kumar Verma, EM
Rabindra Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha and Ors. – Respondent
Original Application No.114/2024/EZ



Advocates:
For the Applicant(s): Mr. Akhand
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Satyabrata Mohanty, Mr. Dipanjan Ghosh, Ms. Rashhmi Singhee, Mr. Sourav Kumar Palai, Mr. Kabiraj Pradhan

Permits under forest conservation laws must be obtained prior to any construction or use of land designated as forest or jungle.

Headnote:(A) Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Section 3 (2) - Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 - Allegations of illegal construction on forest land and tree cutting - No permission granted for occupying Plot No.1793 as the land is recorded as Jungle - Directions for demolition of illegal structures issued. (Paras 1-18)

(B) Case Law - The Hon’ble High Court of Orissa's previous order in W.P.

(C) No.20308/2021 not finding merit in the Sarpanch's appeal regarding the land recorded as jungle. The court found prima facie that the order of the Sub-Collector doesn’t suffer from infirmity. (Para 6)

Facts of the case:
The applicant alleges that illegal structures and tree cutting are taking place on the forest land in Nayagarh, Odisha by specific respondents who lack necessary approvals.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal observed that no permission was obtained for the illegal occupation of Plot No.1793, and confirmed that the land is a recorded jungle. The illegal structure is to be demolished within one month.

Issues: The primary issue addressed was the legality of the construction on jungle land and environmental regulations compliance.

Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal held that no construction can occur on land recorded as jungle without the required permissions under relevant forest laws.

Result: The application is disposed of with orders to demolish illegal structures on the plot.

Table of Content
1. observations on the application and its arguments. (Para 1 , 8 , 10)
2. allegations of illegal construction on forest land. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. court's previous ruling on land classification as jungle. (Para 6 , 12)
4. establishment of unauthorized occupancy leads to demolition orders. (Para 15)
5. final decision on case with directives for restoration. (Para 17 , 19)

ORDER

1. Mr. Akhand, learned Counsel is present (in Virtual Mode) on behalf of the Applicant.

2. Mr. Satyabrata Mohanty, learned Additional Government Advocate is present (in Virtual Mode) on behalf of the State Respondents, State of Odisha. We observe that his name was also mentioned in the earlier order of the Tribunal dated 27.11.2024 but his name is not reflected in the cause list. The Office of the Tribunal is warned to be careful in future.

(Final order of the said case will be uploaded in NGT website by separate sheets of paper).

ORDER

1. Mr. Akhand, learned Counsel is present (in Virtual Mode) on behalf of the Applicant.

2. The allegation in the present Original Application involves tree cutting and illegal construction of building and occupation of forest land on Khata No.387, Plot No.1793, Area Ac. 1.70 dec. in Jhadapada Mouza under Ranapur Tahasil in the District of Nayagar, Odisha by Respondent Nos.10, 11 and 12.

3. It is alleged that Respondent No.12 has already cleared all the trees from the land and constructed a one room pucca building over it; since 2017 the Respondent No.10 i.e. Jhadapada Gram Panchayat has been using it as his office violating all the environmental norms; the Respondent Nos.10, 11 and 12 have jointly started foundation works for construction of a new building of area 1200 square feet over the said land since April, 2024 without requisite approval.

4. The Applicant has appended photographs of the previous constructed house and foundation works for new construction as Annexure-3. A copy of the Record of Rights (ROR) of Khata 387, Plot No.1793 in Jhadapada Mouza under Ranapur Tahasil has also been enclosed as Annexure-1.

5. The Applicant has also referred to Writ Petition (C) No.20308 of 2021 in the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in which the Hon’ble High Court of Orissa has passed the order dated 30.07.2021.

6. The judgment and order of the Hon’ble High Court of Orissa at Cuttack dated 30.07.2021 passed in W.P. (C) No.20308/2021, Jharpada Grama Panchayat vs. State of Odisha and Ors. , reads as under:-

“ORDER

30.07.2021

1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

2. Heard Mr. Nepoleon Sahani, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. P.P. Mohanty, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State.

3. In this Writ Petition the Petitioner has challenged the order dated 26.2.2021 passed by the Sub-Collector, Nayagarh in Lease Appeal Case No.10/2020 rejecting the appeal filed by the Petitioner, who is a Sarpanch, Jharpada Grama Panchayat, to settle a peace of land in its favour for construction of the Grama Panchayat Office. However, it is seen from the record that the said petition has been rejected only on the ground that the land sought to be settled in favour of the Petitioner are recorded as Jungle in Sabik Settlement as per the Letter of the Chief Secretary No.4822/CS dated 12th February, 2015 any land recorded as Jungle in Sabik Settlement cannot be settled in favour of any person or institution without appropriate permission of the Forest Conservation and Disaster Management Department, Odisha. So prima facie the orders passed by the Sub-Collector does not suffer from any infirmity. We do not find any merit in the Writ Petition to issue notice. The Petitioner may file an appropriate application before the Collector, Nayagarh identifying another suitable land for construction of the Grama Panchayat.

4. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed.

5. As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top