SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3774

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Ridhima Pandey – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 429/2022



For the Appellants/Petitioners: None
For the Respondents:Mr. Nikhil Rohatgi and Ms. Anjali Rajput, Advocates for respondents no. 1 and 3, Mr. Mukesh Verma and Ms. Vatsala Tripathi, Advocates for UKPCB (through VC), Mr. C. B. Singh, Advocate for Respondent No. 6 alongwith Mr. Tarun Pant, Project Proponent (through VC), Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon and Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rajawat, Advocates for Police Commissioner, G.B. Nagar, U.P. with Ms. Laxmi Singh, Commissioner of Police (through VC)

Dredging permitting commercial removal of river bed minerals in eco-sensitive zones constitutes illegal mining requiring environmental clearance, not exempt under disaster management; attracts polluter pays compensation up to 10% sale price.

Headnote:(A) Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Section 3; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; EIA Notification, 2006 - Appendix IX (as amended 28.03.2020); Disaster Management Act, 2005 - Permissions for dredging in eco-sensitive zone and reserve forest area - Dredging permitting removal of river bed minerals by private agencies for commercial purposes constitutes mining operations requiring environmental clearance, not mere maintenance/upkeep exempt under Appendix IX - Such activities illegal in eco-sensitive zones without requisite clearances. (Paras 40, 49)

(B) Polluter Pays Principle - Illegal mining causing permanent ecological damage attracts environmental compensation up to 10% of sale price of minerals for remediation and sustainable development. (Paras 50, 52)

(C) Public Authorities - Granting mining permissions in prohibited areas without application of mind violates environmental laws; erring officials accountable; future activities must comply strictly with prohibitions in reserve forests and eco-sensitive zones. (Paras 38, 44, 55)

Facts of the case:
Suo-moto application on complaint alleging illegal mining/dredging in eco-sensitive zone of wildlife sanctuary and reserve forest under guise of disaster management. Short-term permits issued to private entities for river bed mineral extraction upstream in prohibited areas; one permit lapsed without activity due to non-demarcation, other led to extraction despite opposition, with misuse detected.

Findings of Court:
Dredging with commercial mineral removal is mining, not exempt; no activity by one respondent due to forest objection; other respondent conducted illegal extraction attracting compensation; authorities failed to apply mind; High Court judgment binding.

Issues: Whether dredging permits allowing commercial mineral removal in eco-sensitive/reserve forest areas qualify for EC exemption; liability for illegal mining; accountability of permitting authorities; computation of environmental compensation.

Ratio Decidendi: Activities combining dredging with commercial mineral winning constitute prohibited mining in protected areas, beyond exemption for pure maintenance/disaster management; illegal operations trigger polluter pays with compensation based on sale value for ecological restoration; permissions in violation of law warrant inquiry against officials.

Result: Application disposed with directions - no further action against lapsed permit holder; environmental compensation computed/recovered from illegal mining respondent for remediation plan; inquiry into erring officials' conduct; strict future compliance mandated.

Table of Content
1. illegal dredging/mining permitted in esz and reserve forest under dm act guise. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. mining in wildlife habitats violates fc act and ep act. (Para 6 , 7)
3. joint committee confirms permissions in esz; recommends no mining. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. high court prohibits commercial mining under dredging pretext. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
5. permits expired; no activities but misuse detected. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
6. dredging involving mineral removal constitutes illegal mining. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43)
7. private dredging with mineral extraction violates environmental laws. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)
8. polluter pays principle mandates ec for illegal mining. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56)

JUDGMENT

BY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1. This Original Application (hereinafter referred to as ‘OA’) was registered by Tribunal under Sections 14 and 15 of National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (hereinafter referred to asNGT Act, 2010) in exercise of suo-moto jurisdiction in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Ankita Sinha, (2022) 13 SCC 401, in the light of complaint made in the Letter Petition dated 09.04.2022, sent by Ridhima Pandey, daughter of Dinesh Chandra Pandey, resident of 16 A, Sadhu Belapuram Colony, Haripur Kalan, District-Dehradun who claims herself to be a Global Climate activist and engaged in protection of environment and forest since her childhood when she was 9 years old age.

2. Complainant has said that Nandhaur Wildlife Sanctuary (hereinafter referred to asNWS) is situated in the Haldwani Forest Division of Nainital District in State of Uttarakhand. The area is surrounding NWS has been notified as “Eco-Sensitive Zone” (hereinafter referred to asESZ). The upstream part of Nandhaur River falls under ESZ.

3. Uttarakhand Government Industrial Development Department (Mining), vide letter dated 07.01.2022 and the follow up letter/order issued by District Magistrate, Nainital on 25.03.2022 had authorised M/s. A.P. S. Infra Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to asrespondent 4 or project proponent) to collect river bed mineral lying in ESZ of Nandhaur river for a duration of 06 months. The permission was granted with reference to the powers under Disaster Management Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to asDM Act, 2005). The order permits collection of minerals from an area which falls under “Reserve Forest” as well as part of “ESZ of NWS”.

4. District Magistrate, Champawat also, following the same procedure, permitted collection of river bed mineral from upper stream part of Sharda Barrage, Tanakpur vide order dated 05.04.2022 with reference to the provisions of DM Act, 2005. The area, where collection of minerals was allowed by District Magistrate, Champawat, is also part of “Reserve Forest”.

5. Haldwani Forest Division of both the rivers i.e., Nandhaur and Sharda are rich bio-diversity area and important Schedule I Wildlife habitat and ESZ. Mining activity in such area is harmful to wildlife and their habitat and may cause big loss to environment.

6. Government of India, under the provisions of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to asFC Act, 1980) reserves right to grant permission for collection of minor minerals from any river that passes through “Reserve Forest” but at the time of granting permission, volume of river bed minerals to be collected is surveyed by Expert Institutions as well as National Board for Wildlife. Environmental Clearance (hereinafter referred to asEC) is to be taken in advance. If it is not incumbent or necessary to remove river bed minerals from river bed for safety of human life under DM Act, 2005, then permission should be granted only after taking expert team’s opinion about river bed minerals removal from the rivers and the removed river bed m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top