SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3780

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
HON’BLE MR. SHEO KUMAR SINGH, J, HON’BLE DR. ARUN KUMAR VERMA, EM
Vinod Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Original Application No. 200/2023(CZ)



Advocates:
For the Applicant(s): Mr. Naveen Ahuja, Adv., Mr. Kanishk Devesh Sharma, Adv., Ms. Ankita Parmar, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Sagar Jindal, Adv., Mr. Yadvendra Yadav, Adv., Mr. Shoeb Hasan Khan, Adv.

The operation of illegal saw mills violates the Forest Conservation Act, necessitating immediate cessation and regulatory compliance to prevent ecological damage.

Headnote:(A) Forest Conservation Act, 1980 - Guidelines for maintenance of ecological balance and regulation of saw mills - Illegal saw mills operating in Tehsil Lalsot, Rajasthan without permission resulting in tree felling - Supreme Court directives for cessation of non-forest activities without Central approval and formation of committees for identifying forested areas. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Environmental Law - Regulation of wood-based industries - Over 274 saw mills reported without authority in Rajasthan, necessitating strict monitoring and regulation to prevent ecological damage. (Paras 10-11)

Facts of the case:
The applicant raised concerns over illegal saw mills in Rajasthan leading to significant deforestation and environmental degradation, invoking prior Supreme Court rulings to enforce regulations.

Findings of Court:
Violations are evident as several unlicensed saw mills continue operations without adhering to established environmental guidelines, requiring urgent state intervention.

Issues: The main issues pertain to the legality of saw mills operating without permits and the broader implications for forest conservation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that without proper authorization, operation of saw mills violates the Forest Conservation Act, mandating cessation of such activities and compliance with environmental regulations.

Result: Matter to be considered by Principal Bench in New Delhi for pan-India policy application.

Table of Content
1. illegal saw mills are felling trees leading to environmental damage. (Para 1 , 2)
2. supreme court emphasizes censure on unlawful forest activities. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. need for stringent regulations against unlicensed sawmills in rajasthan. (Para 10 , 11)
4. matter to be escalated to principal bench for policy application. (Para 12)

ORDER

1. Issue raised in this application is running of illegal Saw Mills in the villages of Tehsil – Lalsot, District - Dausa, Rajasthan which is giving rise to felling of trees both in forest area as well as in the revenue area as several saw mill owners are continuously flouting the settled environmental principles by illegally carrying out sawing activities in the area in question.

2. It is further alleged that these saw mills are operating illegally without the permission of the concerned authorities. The electricity connections have also been obtained by these saw mills illegally and there has been a massive cutting of trees damaging the forest and green cover.

3. Hon’ble the Supreme Court of India in Civil Original Jurisdiction Writ Petition (Civil) No. 202/1995 T.N. Godavarman Thirumulkpad Vs. Union of India & Ors. decided on 12.12.1996 considered the term Forest as defined in Forest Conservation Act , 1980 and with a view to check further deforestation which ultimately results in ecological imbalance directed the authorities as follows:-

We further direct as under:-

I - GENERAL

1. In view of the meaning of the word “forest” in the act, it is obvious that prior approval of the Central Government is required for any non-forest activity within the area of any “forest”. In accordance with Section 2 of the Act, all on- going activity within any forest in any state throughout the country, without the prior approval of the central government, must cease forthwith. It is, therefore, clear that the running of saw mills of any kind including veneer or plywood mills, and mining of any mineral are non- forest purposes and are, therefore not permissible without prior approval of the Central Government. Accordingly any such activity is prima facie violation of the provisions of the Forest Conservation Act , 1980. Every State Government must promptly ensure total cessation of all such activities forthwith.

2. In addition to the above, in the tropical wet ever-green forests of Tirap and Changlang in the State of Aurnachal Pradesh, there would be a complete ban on felling of any kind of trees therein because of their particular significance to maintain ecological balance needed to preserve bio-diversity. All saw mills, veneer mills and plywood mills in Tirap and Changlang in Arunachal Pradesh and within a distance of 100 Kms. from its border in Assam should also be closed immediately. The State Governments of Arunachal Pradesh and Assam is to ensure compliance of this direction.

3. The felling of trees in all forests is to remain suspended except in accordance with the Working Plans of the State Governments as approved by the Central Government. In the absence of any Working Plan in any particular State such as Arunachal Pradesh, where the permit system exists, the felling under the permits can be done only by the Forest Department of the State Government or the State Forest Corporation.

4. There shall be a complete ban on the movement of the cut trees and timber from any of the seven North- Eastern States to any other state of the country either by rail, road or water-ways. The Indian Railways and the State Governments are directed to take all measures necessary to ensure strict compliance of this direction. This ban will not apply to the movement of certified timber required for defence or other Government purposes. This ban will also not affect felling in any private plantation comprising of trees planted in any area which is not a forest.

5. Each State Government should constitute within one month an Expert Committee to :

(i) Identify areas which are “forests” irrespective of whether they are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top