SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3826

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Gram Panchayat of Bhontawali Village – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Original Application No. 278/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: None
For the Respondents: Mr. Rahul Pratap|Mr. Sushil Jaswal|Mr Vaibhav Srivastava, Ms. Vineeta Tiwari, Mr. Satyajeet Mane, Mr. Atul Parmar|Mr. Anubhav

Solid waste processing site complies with siting criteria; no prior EC required for standalone activities excluding landfill; regulatory monitoring mandated for ongoing compliance.

Headnote:(A) Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 - Siting criteria - Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 - Prior environmental clearance - Garbage dumping site established pursuant to 2003 allotment and NOC for dumping site with prior authorization - Site more than 500 m from riverbed, 1.5 km from school, 800 m from village, complying with siting norms - Standalone municipal solid waste processing (except landfill) not requiring prior EC - No violation of siting criteria warranting relocation - Delays due to local protests but plant now fully operational - Pollution Control Board to monitor monthly compliance, impose compensation/prosecution for violations. (Paras 50, 51)

(B) Environmental Law - Monitoring and compliance - Authorities directed to ensure adherence to waste management rules through regular inspections, remedial/punitive actions; liberty to aggrieved persons to seek remedies. (Para 53)

Facts of the case:
Gram Panchayat filed application seeking relocation of municipal solid waste processing site at least 5 km from residential area and river, alleging violations including lack of prior EC, health hazards, proximity to river/school/village/temple, foul smell, animal deaths. Site allotted in 2003 for dumping, NOC issued, authorization granted pre-2006; dumping started 2021, stopped on protests, now operational after infrastructure upgrades, outsourcing, machineries installed; joint inspections noted partial compliances, EC imposed/deposited; no fresh dumping at old sites.

Findings of Court:
Site complies with siting criteria under SWM Rules, 2016; no prior EC required; plant fully operational; HPSPCB to conduct monthly inspections ensuring compliance, take actions for violations; MC to ensure rule adherence.

Issues: Whether site violates siting criteria mandating relocation; requirement of prior EC; ongoing compliance with waste management rules despite delays and deficiencies.

Ratio Decidendi: Established site allotted for dumping with consents meets siting norms; processing facilities post-2006 but standalone activities exempt from prior EC per MoEF&CC memorandum; operational delays immaterial to legality; continuous regulatory monitoring essential for enforcement.

Result: Original Application disposed of with directions for monitoring and compliance.

Table of Content
1. procedural absence of applicant leads to ex parte hearing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. garbage dumping violates environmental norms near residences. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. site allotted as dumping ground in 2003 with noc. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. infrastructure development and compliance efforts ongoing. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
5. no prior ec required for processing facilities. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
6. environmental compensation imposed for violations. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
7. ongoing inspections reveal persistent deficiencies. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)
8. joint committee mandates ec and remediation. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47)
9. site complies with siting criteria; no relocation. (Para 48 , 49 , 50)
10. mandate monitoring and compliance enforcement. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54)

ORDER

1. This Original Application (hereinafter referred to as ‘OA’) has been called in revise but none has appeared for the applicant.

2. Mr. Rahul Pratap, Advocate for MoEF&CC, Mr. Sushil Jaswal, Advocate for MC, Ponta Sahib, Mr. Vaibhav Srivastava for HPPCB and Mr. Anubhav, Advocate for Respondent No. 5 & 6 are present for respondents.

3. The Court Master informs that twice he tried to contact Counsel for applicant but he has not received any response. In the circumstances, we proceed to hear Counsel for respondents and decide the matter on the basis of record and submissions advanced by Learned Counsel appearing for respondents.

4. OA has been brought before us through Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Gram Pradhan of Village Bhontawali, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh with the prayer that a garbage dumping site established by Municipal Council, Ponta Sahib be directed to be shifted to some other place which should be atleast 5 kms away from residential area as well as river Yamuna. Respondent authorities be further directed to take appropriate action against respondent no. 2 i.e. Municipal Council, Ponta Sahib for establishing the said dumping site in disputed area without seeking any prior environmental clearance and in violation of conditions mentioned in Environmental Clearance, if granted, and also to impose damages/compensation upon violators.

5. The brief facts stated in the OA are that at Khasra No. 385/169 measuring 5 Bigha Muhal, in Revenue Estate of Village Kedarpur, Tehsil Ponta Sahib, District Sirmaur, a garbage dumping site (waste dumping site) has been raised in utter violation of the Rules applicable for establishing dumping site or land filling site. The concerned respondent is throwing/dumping and accumulating garbage of entire Sirmaur District i.e. garbage collected from homes, factories, hospitals, clinics, markets meat shops, chemical industries etc. and this garbage is causing health hazards to local resident of village Bhontawali.

6. Initially, a ‘No Objection’ Certificate was obtained by Municipal Council, Paonta Sahib from Gram Panchayat, Bhontawali in August, 2003 for establishing a bio-gas plant for use and benefit of villagers. Thereafter, nothing was done at site in question upto November, 2021 except taking measurement and construction of boundary wall. Even electricity connection was not obtained by Municipal Council, Paonta Sahib.

7. In the garb of installation of bio-gas plant, Municipal Council, Paonta Sahib started throwing and dumping hazardous garbage in the month of November, 2021 when garbage carrying vehicles started moving in area creating a heap of garbage at the above site.

8. This was beyond imagination of villagers who were under the impression that a bio-gas plant for benefit of villagers shall be established at the site in question. Entire route of vehicle, carrying garbage is through forest which has been re-routed on complaint made by villagers to Forest Department that vehicles moving through forest are causing pollution therein. Presently, vehicles loaded with garbage are passing through thick lanes of village causing pollution in habitab

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top