SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3828

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL KOLKATA (EASTERN ZONE BENCH)
B. Amit Sthalekar, J, Dr. Arun Kumar Verma, EM
Sanjib Dhal & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha & Ors. – Respondent
Original Application No.100/2024/EZ



Advocates:
For the Applicants: Mr. Sankar Prasad Pani, Adv., Mr. Ashutosh Padhy, Adv.
For the Respondents: Ms. Aishwarya Dash, ASC for State of Odisha, Mr. Dipanjan Ghosh, Adv. for R-7 & 8, Mr. Apurba Ghosh, Adv. for R-9, Mr. Subir Kumar Palit, Sr. Adv. a/w Mr. Abhisek Kejriwal, Adv. for R-13

Environmental Clearances must be strictly adhered to, including timely compliance reports and operational conditions; violations can lead to revocation.

Headnote:(A) Environmental Protection Act - Environmental Clearances - Allegations of illegal quarrying and non-compliance with Environmental Clearance conditions lead to revocation of Environmental Clearance owing to excess mining, failure to submit compliance reports, and violations of operational conditions. (Paras 10, 11, 15, 18, 20, 22)

(B) Environmental Compliance - Environmental Clearances issued to project proponents are subject to strict adherence to stipulated conditions including compliance reports, tree plantation, and safety measures. (Paras 11, 15, 20, 22)

Facts of the case:
Applicants, residents of Dhenkanal, challenged illegal operations of a quarry by Respondent No.13, citing violations of Environmental Clearances including excess mining and lack of compliance reports. (Paras 1, 2, 3)

Findings of Court:
Respondent No.13 was found in violation of Environmental Clearance conditions leading to the issuance of a show cause notice regarding revocation of Environmental Clearance. (Paras 16, 19, 22)

Issues: Whether the Respondent No.13 complied with the Environmental Clearance conditions and what actions can be warranted for violations? (Para 22)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity of strict compliance with Environmental Clearances and monitored adherence to environmental safeguards failing which the Environmental Clearance could be revoked. (Paras 19, 22)

Result: The Original Application No.100/2024/EZ is disposed of with no order as to costs.

Table of Content
1. introduction of the application and parties involved (Para 1 , 2)
2. allegations of violations and environmental impact evaluation (Para 4 , 5 , 18)
3. compliance with environmental clearances and actions taken (Para 11 , 15 , 19)
4. final disposition and implications on environmental governance (Para 20 , 22)

ORDER

1. Mr. Sankar Prasad Pani, assisted by Mr. Ashutosh Padhy, learned Counsel is present (in Virtual Mode) on behalf of the Applicants.

2. Affidavit dated 28.01.2025 has been filed on behalf of the Respondent No.9, State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Odisha; the same is taken on record.

3. Affidavit dated 02.12.2024 has been filed by the Divisional Forest Officer, Dhenkanal, Odisha on behalf of the Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 6; the same is taken on record.

(Final order of the said case will be uploaded in website in separate sheets of paper).

ORDER

1. This Original Application has been filed by the four Applicants, who are stated to be the residents of Village-Nihalprasad under Gondia Tahasil of district – Dhenkanal, Odisha, who are aggrieved by the illegal blasting, excess mining and clearing of vegetation by the operation of the Tolarpasi Road Metal Quarry (Black Stone Quarry) of the Lessee Respondent No.13.

2. It is stated that Environmental Clearance was granted to the Tolarpasi Road Metal Quarry (black stone quarry) vide letter dated 18.10.2021 for annual production capacity of 20034 Cum over Plot No.1874, Khata No.467, area 12.25 acres.

3. It is alleged that the Respondent No.13 has no blasting permit for quarrying; the Lessee is quarrying much beyond the approved quantity capacity as laid down in the Environmental Clearance; the Lessee Respondent No.13 is operating the said quarry in violation of Condition No.9.28 of the Environmental Clearance letter dated 18.10.2021. Condition No.9.28 of the Environmental Clearance reads as under:-

9.28 It shall be mandatory for the project management to submit quarterly compliance reports on the status of implementation of the above stipulated environmental safeguards to the SEIAA, Odisha/SPCB, Odisha/Regional Office of the MoEF&CC, Bhubaneswar, in hard and soft copies on 1st day of January, April, July, October of each calendar year, failing which EC is liable to be revoked.”

4. The allegation further is that the Lessee is carrying out transportation of nearly 200 trips of stone overloaded vehicles plying on the RD Road which is not capable of handling such heavy load of vehicles. People of 6 panchayats are directly affected; the plying of vehicles on village road is in violation of Environmental Clearance Condition Nos.9.12, 9.13 and 9.14. Condition Nos.9.12, 9.13 and 9.14 of Environmental Clearance read as under:-

9.12 No transportation of the minerals shall be allowed on any road passing through villages/habitations without prior explicit permission. Transportation of minerals through existing rural roads can be allowed only by the concerned Govt. Department/Gram Panchayat/BDO and only after required strengthening such that carrying capacity of road is increased to handle the mineral carrying truck traffic. The project proponent shall bear the cost towards the widening and strengthening of existing public roads in case the same is proposed to be used for the project. No movement on any road is allowed on existing village road network without appropriately increasing the carrying capacity of such roads. Project proponent shall ensure that the road may not be damaged due to transportation of the mineral and transport of minerals will be as per IRC Guidelines with respect to complying with traffic congestion and traffic density.

9.13 Vehicles hired for transportation of minor mineral from the site should be in good condition and should have pollution check certificate and should conform to applicable air and noise emission standards and should be operated only during non-peak hours. Speed of vehicle be regulated in no case >30 kms/hr be allowed.

9.14 t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top