SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3882

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Ridhima Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 429/2022



For the Appellants/Petitioners: None
For the Respondents:Mr. Nikhil Rohatgi and Ms. Anjali Rajput, Advocates for respondents no. 1 and 3, Mr. Mukesh Verma and Ms. Vatsala Tripathi, Advocates for UKPCB (through VC), Mr. C. B. Singh, Advocate for Respondent No. 6 alongwith Mr. Tarun Pant, Project Proponent (through VC), Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon and Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rajawat, Advocates for Police Commissioner, G.B. Nagar, U.P. with Ms. Laxmi Singh, Commissioner of Police (through VC)

Dredging exemptions do not permit private commercial extraction of river bed minerals in eco-sensitive zones, constituting illegal mining; environmental compensation at 10% sale price mandated under polluter pays principle.

Headnote:(A) Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Section 3; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; EIA Notification, 2006 - Appendix IX (as amended 28.03.2020); Disaster Management Act, 2005 - Permissions for dredging in eco-sensitive zone and reserve forest areas - Dredging for disaster management exempt from environmental clearance but cannot permit commercial mining or removal of river bed minerals by private agencies as it constitutes 'mining operations' attracting environmental safeguards - High Court held private agency permissions invalid, directing state agencies alone to undertake dredging without mineral extraction. (Paras 20, 27, 39, 40, 43, 48-49)

(B) Polluter Pays Principle - Illegal mining in prohibited areas - Environmental compensation leviable at 10% of sale price of illegally extracted minerals for remediation, sustainable development and intergenerational equity, following Supreme Court precedents. (Paras 50-52)

(C) Constitutional Law - Article 51A(g) - Citizens' duty to protect environment - Suo motu jurisdiction exercised on complaint highlighting ecological harm in fragile habitats. (Para 8)

Facts of the case:
Suo motu original application registered on complaint alleging permissions granted under dredging policy and disaster management powers to private entities for river bed mineral collection in eco-sensitive zone and reserve forest of wildlife sanctuary and elephant corridor rivers, causing environmental and biodiversity damage. Permissions lapsed without activity by one entity due to non-demarcation; other entity claimed completion despite official denials, with evidence of misuse and penalties.

Findings of Court:
Permissions illegal as they enabled commercial mining in prohibited areas; no dredging occurred under first permission; second involved illegal extraction requiring compensation computation by pollution control board for remediation plan; inquiry into erring officials' conduct directed; future SOP compliance mandated.

Issues: Whether dredging permissions to private agencies in eco-sensitive zones constitute illegal mining; applicability of EC exemption to commercial extraction; quantum of environmental compensation for violations; accountability of authorities.

Ratio Decidendi: Dredging exemption under EIA Notification applies only to non-commercial maintenance/disaster activities by state; private removal of minerals transforms into prohibited mining in protected zones, violating environmental laws - attracts polluter pays with compensation at 10% sale value; authorities must prevent misuse of dredging guise.

Result: Original Application disposed with directions for compensation recovery, remediation plan, official inquiry, and prohibition of future violations.

Table of Content
1. illegal mining permissions granted in esz and reserve forest under dm act pretext. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. mining in wildlife habitats violates fc act and ep act. (Para 6 , 7)
3. joint committee confirms no mining occurred; area in esz and elephant corridor. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. dredging exempt from ec under eia for disaster management. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. high court prohibits commercial mining under dredging guise in esz. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
6. permits lapsed without activity; sop amended to prevent illegal mining. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
7. illegal permissions in esz warrant accountability; no dredging by private agency. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)
8. respondent 6's activities constitute illegal mining requiring ec. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)
9. polluter pays 10% sale price compensation for illegal mining remediation. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56)

JUDGMENT

BY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1. This Original Application (hereinafter referred to as ‘OA’) was registered by Tribunal under Sections 14 and 15 of National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (hereinafter referred to asNGT Act, 2010) in exercise of suo-moto jurisdiction in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Ankita Sinha, (2022) 13 SCC 401, in the light of complaint made in the Letter Petition dated 09.04.2022, sent by Ridhima Pandey, daughter of Dinesh Chandra Pandey, resident of 16 A, Sadhu Belapuram Colony, Haripur Kalan, District-Dehradun who claims herself to be a Global Climate activist and engaged in protection of environment and forest since her childhood when she was 9 years old age.

2. Complainant has said that Nandhaur Wildlife Sanctuary (hereinafter referred to asNWS) is situated in the Haldwani Forest Division of Nainital District in State of Uttarakhand. The area is surrounding NWS has been notified as “Eco-Sensitive Zone” (hereinafter referred to asESZ). The upstream part of Nandhaur River falls under ESZ.

3. Uttarakhand Government Industrial Development Department (Mining), vide letter dated 07.01.2022 and the follow up letter/order issued by District Magistrate, Nainital on 25.03.2022 had authorised M/s. A.P. S. Infra Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to asrespondent 4 or project proponent) to collect river bed mineral lying in ESZ of Nandhaur river for a duration of 06 months. The permission was granted with reference to the powers under Disaster Management Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to asDM Act, 2005). The order permits collection of minerals from an area which falls under “Reserve Forest” as well as part of “ESZ of NWS”.

4. District Magistrate, Champawat also, following the same procedure, permitted collection of river bed mineral from upper stream part of Sharda Barrage, Tanakpur vide order dated 05.04.2022 with reference to the provisions of DM Act, 2005. The area, where collection of minerals was allowed by District Magistrate, Champawat, is also part of “Reserve Forest”.

5. Haldwani Forest Division of both the rivers i.e., Nandhaur and Sharda are rich bio-diversity area and important Schedule I Wildlife habitat and ESZ. Mining activity in such area is harmful to wildlife and their habitat and may cause big loss to environment.

6. Government of India, under the provisions of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to asFC Act, 1980) reserves right to grant permission for collection of minor minerals from any river that passes through “Reserve Forest” but at the time of granting permission, volume of river bed minerals to be collected is surveyed by Expert Institutions as well as National Board for Wildlife. Environmental Clearance (hereinafter referred to asEC) is to be taken in advance. If it is not incumbent or necessary to remove river bed minerals from river bed for safety of human life under DM Act, 2005, then permi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top