Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PUNE (WESTERN ZONE BENCH)
DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J, DR. VIJAY KULKARNI, ACJ
DILEEP B. NEVATIA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application procedures and objectives. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations made by the applicant. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. ongoing construction and legal limitations. (Para 6 , 16) |
| 4. noise pollution assessments. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. responses from respondents regarding pollution. (Para 12 , 18 , 21) |
| 6. final tribunal directions and decision. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
ORDER
1. By this application following prayers are made:
“i. Allow the instant Application filed by the Appellant herein;
ii. Add proposed respondent Nos. 8, 9, 10 and 11 as party respondent Nos. 8,9,10 and 11 in the proceedings;
iii. Pending the hearing and final disposal of the present application, the respondents be directed to maintain the air quality and noise quality levels for the construction of Mumbai Coastal Road (South) project within the limits specified under the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974 and the Environment (Protection) Act , 1986, including the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules , 2000.
iv. Stay Further construction of Mumbai Coastal Road (South) project being undertaken under the CRZ Clearance dated 11.05.2017;
v. Direct respondent No. 1 to revoke the CRZ Cleara
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
