SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3896

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
HON’BLE MR. SUDHIR AGARWAL, J, HON’BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER
Rana Iqbal Singh Jolly – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Original Application No. 161/2023 (I.A. Nos. 837/2023, 482/2024 & 356/2024)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Vasu Bhushan, Mr. Nipun Bhushan
For the Respondents: Ms. Vasudha Priyansha, Sh. Kshitij Sharma, Mr. Dinesh C. Pandey, Mr. Shubhkaran Singh Gill, Ms. Gurpreet Kaur, Mr. Dushyant Dahiya

Environmental protection regulations mandate that venues conducting commercial activities must obtain proper permits to operate, specifically concerning noise and air quality, to prevent harm to local communities and ecosystems.

Headnote:(A) National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Environmental Protection Laws - Regulations on noise and air pollution resulting from marriage functions held in open spaces without requisite permissions - The Tribunal ordered cessation of operations of an unauthorized venue, finding it in violation of environmental statutes and local regulations. (Paras 1, 5, 10, 43, 45)

(B) Concept of Environmental Governance - Protection of biodiversity and compliance with eco-sensitive zone notifications are paramount. Activities conducted without consent have substantial adverse impacts on the community and the environment. (Paras 10, 22, 23)

(C) Jurisdiction and Authority - Administrative bodies must adhere to statutory mandates regarding land use and operational licenses, and failure to do so necessitates their intervention to ensure legal compliance. (Paras 43, 44)

Facts of the case:
Applicants, residents of Village Karoran, sought relief against noise and air pollution arising from a marriage palace operating without permissions. The Tribunal recognized ongoing complaints from residents and lack of action from agencies responsible for oversight. (Paras 1, 3, 4)

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal found that the venue constituted a significant disturbance to residents and wildlife, lacking the necessary legal approvals. It restrained the venue from further operation until compliance with environmental regulations was assured. (Paras 8, 31)

Issues: The main issues involved the extent of permission required for the venue's operations, the environmental implications of its activities, and compliance with the eco-sensitive stipulated zones. (Paras 8, 43)

Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal held that all operational activities must adhere to environmental laws and local regulations to prevent unacceptable levels of pollution and harm to ecosystems, emphasizing the necessity of obtaining appropriate consent. (Paras 45, 46)

Result: The application was disposed of, mandating compliance with existing environmental laws and denying permission to operate legally until such regulations are followed. (Paras 47, 48)

ORDER

1. Rana Iqbal Singh Jolly, Smt. Seema Jolly, Ms. Vandana Chauhan, Sh. Manjit Lakhmana, Sh. Ravinder Pal Singh Gill, Sh. Jagjit Singh, Sh. Pawan Kumar, Sh. Gurbachan Singh and Karan Singh Jolly, nine applicants filed this Original Application (hereinafter referred to as ‘OA’ being aggrieved by noise and air pollution caused by ‘Hermitage’ (Marriage Palace), Village Karoran, near Punjab Engineering College, Mohali, Nayagaon, Punjab (hereinafter referred to asrespondent 8’) due to use of loudspeakers, bright lights and firecrackers etc.

2. Applicants stated that they are all residents of Village Karoran, SAS Nagar, Mohali for the past three decades and their residences are located at the periphery of the forest area. As per census 2011, population of village is about 2000. Many applicants are senior citizens.

3. Respondent 8 in 2018 started an open air marriage venue in Village Karoran which is located at the periphery of forest area and shares boundary walls with the residences of some of the applicants. During the function of marriage etc., loud noise is caused due to large gatherings, blowing loud music on loudspeakers and air is also polluted due to use of firecrackers throughout the night as well as in early mornings. In the premises of respondent 8, lavish and wide festive parties are organized where DJs play loud music. Attendees create loud cheers and shouting under the influence of liquor at the marriage palace which can be heard at late night/early morning hours. These events and activities not only immensely disturbed the village residents by making it almost impossible to sleep at night, lead a peaceful life and also adversely affected biodiversity of the adjacent forest area. On multiple occasions, villagers and applicants met the management and owners of respondent 8 with request to discontinue their activities but of no consequences. Time and again, management and owners of respondent 8, though, extended assurances that they will discontinue their activities but same continued unabatedly.

4. Applicants and other residents of village also approached concerned authorities complaining about noise and air pollution but they also did not take any appropriate action. Applicants addressed representation dated 07.12.2022 to Punjab State Pollution Control Board (respondent 2); Deputy Commissioner, SAS Nagar, Mohali (respondent 3); Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar, Mohali (respondent 4); Director General of Police, Punjab (respondent 5); Greater Mohali Development Area Authority (respondent 6); and Department of Forests and Wildlife Preservation (respondent 7) requesting them to take action against air /noise pollution caused by respondent 8 by carrying out its activities of creating noise and air pollution but no action has been taken by any of the authority. Activities of respondent 8 disturbed the wildlife also in forest area due to loud music, bright lights and fire crackers and sometime also caused accidents of wild animals with the passing vehicles.

5. Compliant was considered by Tribunal on 14.03.2020 and after being prima-facie satisfied that a substantial question relating to environment has arisen out of implementation of the enactments specified in Scheduled 1 of National Green Tribunal Act , 2010 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NGT, Act, 2010’), notices were issued to respondents, requiring them to file their responses. Tribunal found it appropriate to constitute a joint committee to verify factual position of the area and the activities going at the place in question having concern to the environment and constituted a joint committee comprising representatives of Central Pollution Control Board (hereinafter referred to ’PCB’); Punjab State Pollution Control Board (hereinafter referred to as ‘PSPCB’) and District Magistrate, Mohali.

6. Joint committee was required to submit its report within two months.

7. Joint committee submitted its report through Environmental Engineer, PSPCB vide letter dated 29.05.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top