SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 3986

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL KOLKATA (EASTERN ZONE BENCH)
B. Amit Sthalekar, Judicial Member, Arun Kumar Verma, Expert Member
Srikanta Kumar Pakal – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
Original Application No.167/2023/EZ|I.A. No.75/2024/EZ|I.A. No.129/2024/EZ



Advocates:
For the Applicant(s): Sankar Prasad Pani, Ashutosh Padhy
For the Respondent(s): D. N. Ray, Sourav Haldar, Ashok Prasad, Dipanjan Ghosh, Apurba Ghosh, Surendra Kumar, Jaydeep Pal

NGT holds jurisdiction over environmental violations from illegal minor mineral extraction on revenue forest land for linear projects, directing recovery of compensation; defers to statutory forums on mineral concession penalties.

Headnote:(A) National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Section 14 & Schedule I - Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Illegal extraction of minor minerals (morrum/laterite) for linear railway project without environmental clearance - Extraction from revenue forest land (Jungle-II kissam) constitutes non-forest activity requiring Central Government approval - Temporary permits issued by Tahasildar for limited quantity violated by excessive extraction - Joint Committee found violations, quantified illegal extraction at 8,48,395.7 cum, recommended environmental compensation of Rs.1,20,10,000/- and total dues of Rs.42,45,41,206/- including royalty, penalty - NGT directed State authorities to recover environmental compensation after hearing violator, declined jurisdiction over minor mineral concession rules disputes. (Paras 4, 7, 29, 33-36)

(B) EIA Notification, 2006 - Exemption under Appendix-IX for ordinary earth borrowing in linear projects does not extend to morrum/laterite mining requiring environmental clearance, mining plan, pollution board consents - Contract for 'earthwork' encompasses extraction of specified minerals per mining plan submitted by contractor. (Paras 14, 20-25)

(C) Jurisdiction - NGT to examine environmental violations under specified enactments; matters under minor mineral rules outside purview - Applications to quash enquiry reports/reject OA for non-joinder dismissed. (Paras 31-35)

Facts of the case:
Applicants alleged contractor illegally extracted ~20 lakh cum morrum/earth from specified plots including revenue forest land for railway track construction without clearances; prior royalties/penalties realized; Committee confirmed violations via site inspection, drone survey.

Findings of Court:
Violations established against contractor including on forest-classified land; environmental compensation computation left open; State directed to recover after hearing.

Issues: (i) Whether illegal minor mineral extraction occurred without clearances on forest land; (ii) NGT jurisdiction over environmental violations vs. mineral concession disputes; (iii) Validity of quashing enquiry, dismissal for non-joinder.

Ratio Decidendi: Revenue forest land extraction violates Forest (Conservation) Act without Central approval; environmental violations actionable by NGT; 'earthwork' contracts include mineral extraction per plans; other contractors irrelevant where specific violations/penalties against impugned party proven.

Result: OA disposed directing recovery of environmental compensation; I.A. for quashing enquiry disposed; I.A. for dismissal rejected.

Table of Content
1. illegal morrum extraction without permissions (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 12 , 13)
2. ngt committee inspection findings (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. no ec or consents issued (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. contract involves morrum extraction (Para 14 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
5. respondent solely responsible (Para 15 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 35)
6. habitual illegal mining violations (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
7. ngt jurisdiction on environmental issues (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
8. direct recovery of ec (Para 36 , 37 , 38)

ORDER

1. Mr. Sankar Prasad Pani, assisted by Mr. Ashutosh Padhy, learned Counsel is present (in Virtual Mode) on behalf of the Applicants.

2. The allegation in the present Original Application is that the Respondent Nos.13 is constructing a 3rd line railway track from Bhadrak to Nergundi for which the earthbed is constructed by taking earth/Morrum from various places including Plot No.1606, Khata No.529 under Mania village, Khata No.530, Plot No.48 and Khata No.532, Plot No.550 under the Panchayat Uchapada under Tangi Choudwar Tahasil. It is alleged that about 20 lakh cubic meters of Morrum has been illegally lifted/extracted from various places in Cuttack district. Allegation also is that illegal Morrum mining being carried out on Revenue Forest Land of different villages and trees have been felled by the Respondent No.13 for mining Morrum.

3. It is also alleged that for construction of the railway line, thousands of truckloads of Morrum have been illegally lifted by the Respondent No.13 in Tangi-Choudwar Tahasil without any valid permission or N.O.C. from the Uchapada Gram Panchayat under Tangi-Choudwar Tahasil. It is also alleged that vide Receipt dated 27.05.2020, the Tahasildar had collected royalty of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees one lakh fifty thousand only) and penalty of Rs.49,500/- (Rupees forty-nine thousand five hundred only) from the Respondent No.13 for illegally extracted Morrum. The details of the Khata and Plot of the land from where the Morrum and Soil are alleged to have been lifted in Tangi Choudwar Tahasil are given in a Table in para 15 which reads as under: -

“Sl. No.KisamKhata No.Plot No.
1Jungle two532550
2Patita5291606
3Uncultivable waste land53048”

4. It is alleged that Morrum is a minor mineral and cannot be lifted from source without a Environmental Clearance issued by the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA for short), with Approved Mining Plan and Consent from the State Pollution Control Board but no such documents are there in the present case for carrying out the illegal mining of Morrum.

5. At the time of admission, this Tribunal constituted a Committee comprising of the following members:-

i) Senior Scientist, Odisha State Pollution Control Board;

ii) District Mining Officer, Cuttack;

iii) District Collector, Cuttack or his representative Officer not below the rank of Additional District Magistrate (A.D.M.); and

iv) Divisional Forest Officer, Cuttack

6. The Committee was directed to visit the site and submit its report with regard to the allegations made in the Original Application.

7. The Respondent No.9, State Pollution Control Board, Odisha, has filed affidavit dated 09.02.2024 and along with this affidavit, an Inspection Report of an inspection of the site carried out on 18.12.2023 has been filed which reads as under:-

“REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CONSTITUTED BY THE HON’BLE NGT VIDE THEIR ORDER DTD. 23.11.2023, IN THE MATTER OF OA NO. 167/2023/EZ- SRIKANTA KUMAR PAKAL & ORS VERSUS STATE OF ODISHA & ORS I. BACKGROUND:

1. An application has been filed by Srikanta Kumar Pakal & Ors before the Hon’ble NGT, EZB vide OA No.167/2023/EZ alleging that the Respondent No. 13 i.e., M/s. Shanti Construction Pvt. Limited is constructing a third line railway track from Bhadrak. to Nergundi for which the earthbed is constructed by taking earth/morrum from various places including Plot No.1606 of Khata No.529, Plot No.48 of Khata No.530 and Plot No.550 of Khata No.532 under Mania Village, Tangi-Choudwar Tahasil o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top