SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4005

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Sanjay Kumar Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
Original Application No.47/2022



For the Appellants/Petitioners: Applicant in Person
For the Respondents:Mr. Pradeep Misra and Mr. Daleep Dhani, Advocates for UPPCB
Mr. Preet Singh Oberoi, Advocate for Respondent No. 5

Industrial effluent discharge into storm water drain joining river violates law unless meeting surface water standards (COD <50 mg/l), despite industrial compliance; attracts polluter pays compensation.

Headnote:(A) Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Section 24 - National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Sections 14, 15 - Environmental law - Polluter pays principle - Industrial effluent discharge into storm water drain leading to river - Treated effluent meeting industrial standards but failing surface water standards (COD <50 mg/l) constitutes violation - No authorization for discharge into storm water drain; effluent must meet standards of ultimate receptor (surface water) - Environmental compensation to be computed for violation period; discharge to cease unless compliant. (Paras 33-39)

(B) Environmental compliance - Consent to operate does not permit discharge into storm water drain joining river without meeting surface water norms - Parameters context-specific (irrigation, marine, drinking vs. surface water); high COD levels pollute river - Directions for computation of compensation, cessation of discharge, and enforcement. (Paras 32-39)

Facts of the case:
Applicant, owner of agricultural land, alleged continuous discharge of toxic industrial wastewater from carpet manufacturing unit into his fields via public drain, causing crop loss and soil degradation over 20 years; claimed compensation. Joint Committees inspected, found ETP functional with compliant industrial discharge norms but broken outlet drain, high drain pollutants, and effluent via storm water drain to river; no direct crop damage verified; unit paid minor sums for drain maintenance.

Findings of Court:
No sustainable evidence of crop damage justifying compensation claim; prior payments indicated sufficient remediation. Unit violated law by discharging treated effluent into storm water drain to river without meeting surface water standards; liable for environmental compensation from filing date; directed to stop such discharge within one month.

Issues: Whether applicant entitled to crop loss compensation; whether industrial effluent discharge into storm water drain joining river violates law despite meeting industrial norms.

Ratio Decidendi: Treated industrial effluent cannot be discharged into storm water drain reaching river unless meeting surface water standards (e.g., COD <50 mg/l); violation of Section 24 Water Act attracts polluter pays; appellate environmental norms based on ultimate use/receptor.

Result: OA disposed; no crop compensation; UPPCB to compute/ recover environmental compensation for violation till filing; unit to cease non-compliant discharge within one month.

Table of Content
1. applicant's land damaged by industrial effluent discharge (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. joint committee reports confirm etp compliance, no field pollution (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 16 , 18)
3. parties contest crop damage and compensation claims (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
4. effluents pollute jhiriya nala entering river ganga (Para 19 , 20 , 22 , 23)
5. industrial effluent must meet surface water standards (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
6. polluter pays compensation; cease non-compliant discharge (Para 38 , 39 , 40)

ORDER

1. This Original Application was registered under Sections 14 and 15 (b) and (c) of National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 on an application from Sanjay Kumar Pal, R/o Village Jauharpur, Tehsil Gyanpur, District Bhadohi, though presently residing at Ekta Chawal, Committee Tata Nagar Bhandup, East Mumbai, Maharshtra.

2. Applicant has stated that his mother Phul Devi was owner of … share (18 Biswas) of Araji No.371, area 0.895 hectare, situated at village Jauharpur, Tehsil Gyanpur, District Bhadohi. after her death, applicant’s name has been mutated in revenue record by order dated 01.07.2021 passed by Competent Authority.

3. Respondent 5,-M/s Obeetee Pvt. Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as ‘proponent’,) is a manufacturer and supplier of Hand Tufted, Hand knotted carpet having its unit at Gopipur, Gopiganj, Bhadhoi (Sant Ravidas Nagar).

4. Respondent 5 is discharging waste water containing toxic substances in agriculture land of applicant and other farmers for a long time, as a result whereof crop of applicant and other farmers was damaged causing losses to applicant in respect of productivity. Due to continuous flow of waste water in agricultural land of applicant, soil level had gone down by 3 feet on account whereof, applicant is unable to sow the crops in his field. Applicant has suffered loss of Rs.20,98,400/- in paddy crops; Rs.15,33,250/- in wheat crops and Rs.17,00,000/-in vegetable crops in the last 20 years. For improvement of soil and upgrading the level of agriculture field, applicant would require substantial amount of more than Rs.36,58,368/-, Applicant claims that he is entitled for compensation for damage caused to the fertility of agriculture land and crops to the extent of Rs.95,78,018/- from the proponent.

5. Applicant made several complaints to various authorities and one of such representation is dated 11.06.2021 which is on record as Annexure- H to Original Application. On the complaint of applicant, area Lekhpal, Tehsil Gyanpur, District Bhadhoi submitted report certifying damage to the crop and difficulty in farming. Lekhpal’s report dated 01.07.2021 is on record as Annexure-A-9.

6. Explanation was sought by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Gyanpur from the proponent. Respondent 5 explained that for the damage caused to the agricultural field of the applicant, it is paying Rs.15,000/- per annum and similar financial assistance is provided to other co-sharer/co- owners. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Gyanpur vide letter dated 19.07.2021 communicated the above stand of proponent to the applicant. Letter of Sub Divisional Magistrate is on record as Annexure-A-10 (page/63). Sub Divisional Magistrate, Gyanpur also submitted report dated 09.07.2021 to District Magistrate, Bhadhoi confirming that effluent discharged from the proponent’s industrial unit, collected in the agricultural field of the applicant, is causing difficulty in agricultural activities. Proponent explained that effluent from industrial unit is discharged in Jhiriyapul (a public drain) and proponent also carry out cleanliness and maintenance activities from time to time which could not be possible at the time of complaint due to rainy season and repair shall be carried out after the rains.

7. In the above backdrop, applicant has stated that limitation commences from 11.06.2021 when the applicant sent his representation claiming damages and also on 22.11.2021 when Writ Petition No.23829 of 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top