SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4064

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CHENNAI (SOUTHERN ZONE BENCH)
Smt. Pushpa Sathyanarayana, J, Dr. Satyagopal Korlapati, ACJ
Meenava Thanthai K.R. Selvaraj Kumar Meenavar Nala Sangam – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu State Environment Impact Assessment Authority – Respondent
Original Application No.07 of 2022 (SZ)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. G. Stanly Hebzon Singh, Mr. K. Mageshwaran
For the Respondents: Mr. G.M. Syed Nurullah Sheriff, Mr. S. Sai Sathya Jith, Dr. D. Shanmuganathan, Mr. B. Radhakrishnan, Mr. K. Sivasubramaniyan

An educational institution must obtain Environmental Clearance, and hospitals are not exempt from this requirement under the EIA Notification, confirming obligations for compliance with environmental laws.

Headnote:(A) Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 19 and 5 - Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 - Consent to Establish - Violation of environmental regulations by an educational institution operating without necessary approvals - The 4th Respondent, a medical college and hospital, was found operating without prior Environmental Clearance and Consent from the authorities. The Tribunal directed the computation of environmental compensation for violations and recovery for remediation. The applicant sought demolishment of unauthorized structures and compensation for environmental damage. (Paras 1-52)

(B) Exemption Clauses - The court reaffirmed that hospitals do not fall under the exemptions granted to educational institutions concerning Environmental Clearance, as stated in O.M. dated 09.06.2015. Compliance with environmental norms is mandatory regardless of internal classifications. (Paras 31-32)

(C) Judicial Authority on Environmental Laws - The authority emphasized that notifications lacking explicit retrospective effect cannot be construed as such, and compliance with established environmental protocols is non-negotiable. (Paras 22-23)

(D) Violation Category - The Tribunal held that the operational status of the 4th Respondent is classified under the ‘violation’ category necessitating severe penalties to address the continuing non-compliance with environmental laws. (Paras 29-34)

Table of Content
1. applicant allege environmental violations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. seeking action against environmental law violations. (Para 7 , 10 , 31)
3. regulatory framework and prior non-compliance. (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 16 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 28)
4. determining environmental compensation for violations. (Para 18 , 19)
5. exemption applicability for environmental clearances. (Para 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 36)
6. final judgment and directives for environmental compliance. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52)

JUDGEMENT

Delivered by Smt. Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, Judicial Member

1. The applicant, which is a registered society founded in order to work towards the upliftment and improvement of conditions of life, has expressed his concern about the environmental violations committed by the 4th Respondent viz., M/s. ACS Medical College and Hospital, which is established and commenced their operation without obtaining requisite prior Environmental Clearance and Consent from the authorities.

2. The applicant has alleged that the 4th Respondent has violated several environmental regulations, causing harm to the environment and public health. In the application, the applicant has contended that the 4th Respondent had commenced construction and operation of the medical college and hospital in a built-up area of 78,103.58 Sq. Meters in a land area of 1,19,263.71 Sq. Meters in Survey Nos.35/1, 2, 3, 63/2, 64/1A and 1B2 in Numbal Village, Ponnamallee Taluk, Thiruvallur District, without prior Environmental Clearance from the State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority – Tamil Nadu (for short ‘SEIAA – Tamil Nadu’).

3. It is alleged that the operation of the 4th Respondent falls under ‘B’ Category of Item 8 (a) - ‘Building and Construction Projects’ of the EIA Notification, wherein the prior Environmental Clearance is mandatory before the commencement of the construction of the medical college and hospital. The 4th Respondent has not obtained the mandatory Consent to Establish and Consent to Operate under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 . It is further alleged that the 4th Respondent failed to obtain authorization letter under the provisions of the Bio Medical Waste Management Rules , 2016 for the proper segregation, storage and disposal of biomedical waste.

4. The applicant alleges that unscientific disposal and dumping of biomedical waste would cause severe health hazards to the people in the vicinity. The unscientific, unauthorized and undesignated segregation and disposal of biomedical waste by the 4th Respondent causes a great threat to the general public, doctors, nurses and health care workers.

5. The other allegation is that there is no effective ETP to treat the untreated effluents generated from the hospital and medical college and the same is being discharged into the public drainage. The next allegation levelled against the 4th Respondent is regarding the illegal extraction of the groundwater for the operation of the medical college and hospital. It is alleged that the Project Proponent had illegally sunk several bore wells in the project site for the medical college and hospital. The 4th Respondent has failed to obtain permission from the Central Groundwater Authority/ State Groundwater Authority prior to the extraction of the groundwater from the project site.

6. The applicant also has sent a representation in this regard dated 18.11.2021 to the authorities concerned, highlighting the non-compliance of the environmental norms by the 4th Respondent. However, no action has been taken by the authorities for the violation of the provisions of the EIA Notification, Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 , Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 .

7. So, on the above grounds, the applicant seeks directions to the authorities to take stringent action against the 4th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top