SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4110

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL KOLKATA (EASTERN ZONE BENCH)
B. Amit Sthalekar, J, Arun Kumar Verma, Expert Member
Monoj Hazarika – Appellant
Versus
Bonani Kakkar – Respondent
Miscellaneous Application No. 31/2023/EZ|Original Application No.43/2020/EZ



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Devansh Mohta, Mr. Vikram Rajkhowa
For the Respondents: Mr. Sridhar Potaraju, Ms. Petal Chandhok, Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. Ashok Prasad, Ms. Amrita Pandey, Ms. Malabika Roy Dey

Severely damaged houses do not qualify for compensation tier meant for completely gutted houses; original categorization prevails over subsequent expansions; additional interim claims rejected as treating unequals as equals.

Headnote:(A) National Green Tribunal - Interim compensation - Oil blowout incident causing damage to houses, health, livelihood, crops, livestock - Expert Committee categorized affected families into three categories: (i) houses completely gutted - Rs.25 lakhs; (ii) houses severely damaged - Rs.10 lakhs; (iii) moderately/partially damaged - Rs.2.5 lakhs - Subsequent recommendations by District Administration expanded Category-I to include severely damaged houses (161 families) at Rs.25 lakhs and Category-II (439 families) at Rs.20 lakhs - Partial payments made: Rs.15 lakhs to 161 families and Rs.10 lakhs to 439 families - Tribunal holds additional 161 families do not qualify for Category-I (completely gutted) but fall in Category-II (severely damaged) entitled to Rs.10 lakhs only - Prior partial payments adjustable against final compensation - Claims for balance interim amounts rejected as unequals cannot be treated as equals. (Paras 50-64)

(B) Environmental compensation - Adjudication - Tribunal cannot direct higher interim compensation without evidence of loss; final claims require material proof - Directions for expeditious disbursement do not alter original categorization fixed by Tribunal. (Paras 23, 65)

Facts of the case:
Miscellaneous Application seeking directions for balance interim compensation to affected families from oil blowout and explosion incident - Applicant claimed 161 families entitled to additional Rs.10 lakhs each (total Rs.25 lakhs) and 439 families to additional Rs.10 lakhs each (total Rs.20 lakhs) - Respondent opposed citing original Tribunal categorization and partial payments already made totaling substantial amounts.

Findings of Court:
161 additional families with severely damaged houses fall in Category-II (Rs.10 lakhs interim compensation), not Category-I (Rs.25 lakhs); 439 families already paid full Category-II amount; no further interim payments directed; issue of final compensation left open.

Issues: Whether additional 161 families qualify for Category-I compensation of Rs.25 lakhs; entitlement of Category-II families to enhanced Rs.20 lakhs interim compensation.

Ratio Decidendi: Original Expert Committee categorization binding; severely damaged houses do not equate to completely gutted for higher compensation tier; advance payments do not constitute admission of enhanced liability; claims beyond established categories rejected absent evidence.

Result: Miscellaneous Application rejected.

Table of Content
1. interim compensation categories post-oil blowout disaster (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. revised categories and demands by locals/district commissioner (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. ngt/supreme court directions on compensation disbursement (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. oil's payments and objection to further liability (Para 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. oil arguments against expanded category-i classification (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
6. applicant's claims and supreme court clarifications (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48)
7. rejection of additional category-ii compensation claims (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54)
8. strict category-i limited to completely gutted houses (Para 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65)
9. miscellaneous application rejected; final compensation pending (Para 66 , 67 , 68)

JUDGMENT

PRESENT:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. AMIT STHALEKAR (JUDICIAL MEMBER)

HON’BLE DR. ARUN KUMAR VERMA (EXPERT MEMBER)

__________________________________________________________________

Reserved On:-06th December, 2024

Pronounce On:- 13th December, 2024

__________________________________________________________________

1. Whether the Judgment is allowed to be published on the net? Yes

2. Whether the Judgment is allowed to be published in the NGT Reporter? Yes

Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicants and the learned Counsel for the Respondents and perused the documents on record.

2. The present Miscellaneous Application No.31/2023/EZ has been filed by the Applicant, seeking the following reliefs: -

(i) “direct the respondents to expeditiously disburse the balance interim compensation amount of Rs.10.00 lakhs per family to the 161 families in Category-I, i.e. Rs.25.00 lakhs (-) less advance Rs.15.00 lakhs = Rs.10.00 lakhs per family, and/or

(ii) direct the respondents to expeditiously disburse the balance interim compensation amount of Rs.10.00 lakhs per family to the 439 families in Category-II, i.e., Rs.20.00 lakhs (-) less advance Rs.10.00 lakhs = Rs.10.00 lakhs per family, and/or

(iii) grant such other consequential reliefs pertaining to “interim compensation” that this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper, including interest on the ‘interim compensation’ amount being due, and/or

(iv) pass any other such order(s)/direction(s) as this Hon’ble Tribunal seem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the present case.”

3. The Original Application No. 43/2020/EZ (Bonani Kakkar Vs. Oil India Limited) was taken up by the National Green Tribunal, New Delhi Bench, in respect of an incident relating to destruction and damage caused by the oil blowout and explosion that took place in BGN-5 Oil Well at Baghjan, Assam, stated to be due to the acts and omissions of the Oil India Limited.

4. The National Green Tribunal vide its order dated 24.06.2020 constituted a Committee of Experts headed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. P. Katakey, former Judge of the Guwahati High Court. A Preliminary Report dated 24.07.2020 was submitted by the Experts Committee before the National Green Tribunal, New Delhi Bench.

5. It is stated that the Committee was of the unanimous view that blowout and the subsequent explosion has led to extensive damage to the public owned resources and has also caused irreparable harm and damage to private owned property of the survivors in the affected villages.

6. The National Green Tribunal, New Delhi Bench vide its order dated 06.08.2020 observed that the Experts Committee assessed the interim compensation payable to the affected villagers and passed recommendation which is as under: -

“Preliminary Interim Measures IV. Interim Compensation to the affected families

1. The Committee, proposes the formulation of three categories of affected families to assess the question of interim compensation namely;

(i) Those whose houses have been completely gutted by the fire thereby causing grave injury to life and health, loss of livelihood, cultivable land

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top