SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4183

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Sanjay Kumar Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
Original Application No.47/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Applicant in Person
For the Respondents: Mr. Pradeep Misra, Mr. Daleep Dhani, Mr. Preet Singh Oberoi

Treated industrial effluent cannot be discharged into storm water drains joining rivers unless meeting surface water standards (COD <50 mg/l), violating pollution laws despite general compliance; polluter pays principle mandates compensation.

Headnote:(A) Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Section 24 - National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Sections 14, 15 - Environmental law - Industrial effluent discharge - Storm water drain leading to river - Treated effluent not meeting surface water standards (COD <50 mg/l) cannot be discharged into storm water drain ultimately joining river, even if compliant with general industrial norms - Violation of prohibition on polluting rivers - Polluter pays principle applicable - Environmental compensation to be calculated from filing date. (Paras 33-39)

(B) Environmental law - Consent to operate - Does not authorize discharge into storm water drain without meeting standards for ultimate receiving water body (surface water) - Parameters context-specific (irrigation, marine, drinking vs. surface water). (Paras 34-36)

Facts of the case:
Applicant, owner of agricultural land, alleged that carpet manufacturing unit discharged toxic wastewater via drain, damaging crops and soil over years, claiming compensation. Unit denied, citing compliant ETP and payments for drain maintenance. Multiple joint committees inspected, finding ETP functional but broken outlet drain, high COD in effluent, mixed industrial/domestic discharge via natural/storm water drain (nala) into river. No direct proof of crop damage on applicant's land.

Findings of Court:
No compensation to applicant for crop loss due to lack of evidence of sown crops damaged by effluent. Unit in violation for discharging treated effluent (high COD) into storm water drain joining river without meeting surface water standards. Direct UPPCB to compute and recover environmental compensation from filing date (16.12.2021), prohibit such discharge henceforth within one month.

Issues: (1) Entitlement to crop/soil damage compensation; (2) Legality of discharging treated industrial effluent into storm water drain leading to river without surface water compliance.

Ratio Decidendi: Storm water drains not for industrial effluent; discharge reaching river must meet surface water standards (e.g., COD <50 mg/l), irrespective of general industrial compliance or consent terms requiring self-arrangement for disposal - constitutes pollution under Section 24, attracting polluter pays.

Result: OA disposed with directions for environmental compensation calculation/recovery and cessation of non-compliant discharge.

Table of Content
1. applicant's land damaged by industrial effluent discharge. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. tribunal orders joint committee inspections and reports. (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. joint committees find etp compliant but drain issues. (Para 10 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18)
4. parties contest crop damage and compensation claims. (Para 17 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
5. uppcb and nmcg reports on drain pollution controls. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
6. no proven crop damage for compensation award. (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
7. industrial effluent discharge violates surface water standards. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
8. polluter pays compensation; cease unlawful discharge. (Para 38 , 39 , 40)

ORDER

1. This Original Application was registered under Sections 14 and 15 (b) and (c) of National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 on an application from Sanjay Kumar Pal, R/o Village Jauharpur, Tehsil Gyanpur, District Bhadohi, though presently residing at Ekta Chawal, Committee Tata Nagar Bhandup, East Mumbai, Maharshtra.

2. Applicant has stated that his mother Phul Devi was owner of … share (18 Biswas) of Araji No.371, area 0.895 hectare, situated at village Jauharpur, Tehsil Gyanpur, District Bhadohi. after her death, applicant’s name has been mutated in revenue record by order dated 01.07.2021 passed by Competent Authority.

3. Respondent 5,-M/s Obeetee Pvt. Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as ‘proponent’,) is a manufacturer and supplier of Hand Tufted, Hand knotted carpet having its unit at Gopipur, Gopiganj, Bhadhoi (Sant Ravidas Nagar).

4. Respondent 5 is discharging waste water containing toxic substances in agriculture land of applicant and other farmers for a long time, as a result whereof crop of applicant and other farmers was damaged causing losses to applicant in respect of productivity. Due to continuous flow of waste water in agricultural land of applicant, soil level had gone down by 3 feet on account whereof, applicant is unable to sow the crops in his field. Applicant has suffered loss of Rs.20,98,400/- in paddy crops; Rs.15,33,250/- in wheat crops and Rs.17,00,000/-in vegetable crops in the last 20 years. For improvement of soil and upgrading the level of agriculture field, applicant would require substantial amount of more than Rs.36,58,368/-, Applicant claims that he is entitled for compensation for damage caused to the fertility of agriculture land and crops to the extent of Rs.95,78,018/- from the proponent.

5. Applicant made several complaints to various authorities and one of such representation is dated 11.06.2021 which is on record as Annexure- H to Original Application. On the complaint of applicant, area Lekhpal, Tehsil Gyanpur, District Bhadhoi submitted report certifying damage to the crop and difficulty in farming. Lekhpal’s report dated 01.07.2021 is on record as Annexure-A-9.

6. Explanation was sought by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Gyanpur from the proponent. Respondent 5 explained that for the damage caused to the agricultural field of the applicant, it is paying Rs.15,000/- per annum and similar financial assistance is provided to other co-sharer/co- owners. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Gyanpur vide letter dated 19.07.2021 communicated the above stand of proponent to the applicant. Letter of Sub Divisional Magistrate is on record as Annexure-A-10 (page/63). Sub Divisional Magistrate, Gyanpur also submitted report dated 09.07.2021 to District Magistrate, Bhadhoi confirming that effluent discharged from the proponent’s industrial unit, collected in the agricultural field of the applicant, is causing difficulty in agricultural activities. Proponent explained that effluent from industrial unit is discharged in Jhiriyapul (a public drain) and proponent also carry out cleanliness and maintenance activities from time to time which could not be possible at the time of complaint due to rainy season and repair shall be carried out after the rains.

7. In the above backdrop, applicant has stated that limitation commences from 11.06.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top