SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4231

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL KOLKATA (EASTERN ZONE BENCH)
B. Amit Sthalekar, JM, Satyagopal Korlapati, EM
Karunath Pazing – Appellant
Versus
Arunachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board – Respondent
Original Application No.10/2024/EZ



Advocates:
For the Respondents: Mr. Surendra Kumar, Mr. Ashok Prasad, Ms. Amrita Pandey, Mr. Vikas Baisya

The Tribunal ruled that compliance with environmental guidelines is mandatory, especially regarding distance from sensitive locations, necessitating strict enforcement against violators.

Headnote:(A) Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - No Objection Certificate - The case concerns the legality of the operation of a Stone Crushing Unit and its compliance with environmental guidelines. The Applicant alleges operation without necessary permissions, resulting in environmental damage. The NOC was granted and later revoked due to non-compliance with distance regulations. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Environmental Compliance - Measures such as necessary environmental and pollution control systems were found inadequate. The Tribunal established that the site violated the mandated distances from sensitive locations. (Paras 27-28)

(C) Departmental Proceedings - In light of procedural violations, action was mandated against responsible officials for issuing an NOC under false pretenses. (Paras 29-31)

Facts of the case:
Karunath Pazing alleges M/s Balaji Minerals has been operating illegally without proper environmental approvals, violating critical distance guidelines pertaining to environmental safety.

Findings of Court:
The Stone Crushing Unit was found to violate the Arunachal Pradesh Stone Crusher Guidelines, leading to the Tribunal's decision to prohibit its operation and initiate actions against relevant officials.

Issues: The main issue was the legality of the Stone Crusher Unit's operation considering its proximity to a Reserve Forest.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that merely being beyond a Wildlife Sanctuary does not excuse non-compliance with proximity regulations to Reserve Forests as specified by environmental laws.

Result: The Functioning of the Stone Crusher Unit is prohibited and actions initiated against negligent officials.

Table of Content
1. illegality of the stone crusher unit's operation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. environmental compliance and guidelines reference. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 21 , 24)
3. responsibility for noc issuance. (Para 26 , 27)
4. legal directives by the tribunal. (Para 28 , 29)
5. consequences of violations and directives for action. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 36)

ORDER

1. The allegation of the Applicant in the present Original Application is that the Respondent No.13, M/s Balaji Minerals, is carrying on illegal operation of Stone Crushing Unit near Siku River Bridge under Mebo Circle, District-East Siang, without necessary permissions from the Government authorities and in violation of the environmental guidelines.

2. It is stated that No Objection Certificate (‘NOC’ for short) was granted on 14.02.2023 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Pasighat Forest Division, Pasighat, but the same was subsequently cancelled on 06.11.2023 by the same officer. It is also stated that the Consent to Establish/Consent to Operate order has been granted by the Arunachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board vide certificate dated 25.06.2021.

3. The allegation further is that the said Stone Crusher Unit of Respondent No.13 is located 300 meters from the National Highway and 400 meters from the Siku Notko Resort whereas as per environmental guidelines it should be installed at a distance of at least one kilometer from the National Highway and half a kilometer from human habitation.

4. It is also alleged that as of today, there is no Forest Clearance from the Forest Division. The pollution control measures i.e. dust containment-cum-suppression system for the equipment, construction of wind breaking walls, regular cleaning and wetting of the ground within the premises and greenbelt along the periphery, have not been installed by the Respondent No.13.

5. It is also stated that the Applicant has submitted representation before the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Mebo, East Siang District, as well as the District Forest Officer (T), Pasighat Forest Division, and the Assistant Mineral Development Officer, Pasighat, on 31.10.20223 (page 28 of the paper book), but no order has been passed till date.

6. The Arunachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board, Respondent No.1, has filed affidavit dated 18.03.2024 and it is stated that the NOC has been issued by the Assistant Mineral Development Officer (ADMO), Department of Geology & Mining, East Siang District, vide letter dated 23.06.2021 (page 101 of paper book) as the Respondent No.13 Stone Crushing Unit is at a distance of about 300 meters from the National Highway/State road. Along with the affidavit, photographs have also been filed showing the premises of the Respondent No.13, Project Proponent, which confirms stone crushing activity of the Respondent No.13.

7. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Respondent No.4, in its affidavit of 09.04.2024 has stated that stone crushing units should operate only after obtaining Consent to Establish (CTE) and Consent to Operate (CTO) from the concerned State Pollution Control Boards/Pollution Control Committees. It is also stated that the stone crushing units fall under Schedule-I of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, and are categorized under ‘Orange’ category vide Central Pollution Control Board order dated 07.03.2016 with a Pollution Index Score of 41 to 59 in a Pollution Index Range from 0 to 100.

8. The Deputy Conservator of Forests (Conservation), Department of Environment, Government of Arunachal Pradesh, has filed affidavit dated 15.07.2024 on behalf of the Respondent No.2, stating therein that the NOC dated 14.02.2023 of the Stone Crusher Unit of Respondent No.13 was issued by the Divisional Forest Officer, Pasighat, as per the application of the Respondent No.13 on the strength of physical verification report of the Range Officer, Mebo. However, it is stated that the said NOC was subsequently cancelled by the Divisional F

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top