Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
SUDHIR AGARWAL, J, DR. AFROZ AHMAD, ACJ
Madan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction determined by the tribunal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. inspections reveal substantial illegal mining. (Para 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 3. action taken against illegal mining violators. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. no evidence against primary respondent. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. application disposed due to lack of further orders. (Para 14 , 15) |
ORDER
1. This Original Application was registered in exercise of suo-moto jurisdiction in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in “Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Ankita Sinha & Ors.” reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 897 by registering letter petition dated 30.08.2023 sent by Madan Lal s/o Kalturam r/o Village Asoi, Khat Bharam, PO Baila, Tehsil- Chakrata, District Dehradun, State of Uttarakhand under Section 14 and 15 of National Green Tribunal Act , 2010 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NGT Act, 2010’).
2. Complainant has stated that Diwan Singh s/o Mehar Singh r/o Village Asoi, Khat Bharam is presently Gram Pradhan and engaged in large scale illegal mining of sand, boulder, bajri etc. by using heavy machines like JCB in Kanasar Range under Aasai Pattern Tones Rivers and transporting minerals using tractors by constructing a road on complainant’s la
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
