SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4332

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL KOLKATA (EASTERN ZONE BENCH)
B. Amit Sthalekar, Judicial Member, Arun Kumar Verma, Expert Member
Srikanta Kumar Pakal – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
Original Application No.167/2023/EZ|I.A. No.75/2024/EZ|I.A. No.129/2024/EZ



Advocates:
For the Applicants: Sankar Prasad Pani, Ashutosh Padhy
For the Respondents: D. N. Ray, Sourav Haldar, Ashok Prasad, Dipanjan Ghosh, Apurba Ghosh, Surendra Kumar, Jaydeep Pal

Illegal morrum extraction from revenue forest land without environmental clearance violates EPA & FCA; NGT directs state recovery of CPCB-calculated compensation, limiting jurisdiction to environmental issues excluding minor mineral concessions.

Headnote:(A) National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Section 14 and Schedule I - Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Illegal extraction of minor minerals (morrum/laterite) for linear railway project without environmental clearance - Extraction from revenue forest land (Jungle-II kissam) requires prior Central Government approval - Temporary permits issued by Tahasildar for limited quantity exceeded; multiple instances of illegal excavation confirmed by joint committee using drone-DGPS survey - Environmental compensation calculated using CPCB formula (EC=PI×N×R×S×LF) recommended at Rs.1.20 crore; additional royalties, penalties under minor mineral rules totaling over Rs.42 crores - NGT jurisdiction limited to environmental violations, not minor mineral concession rules disputes - State authorities directed to recover compensation after hearing violator. (Paras 4, 7, 29-36)

(B) EIA Notification, 2006 - Exemption under Appendix-IX for ordinary earth borrowing in linear projects does not cover morrum mining requiring clearance - Mining plan submitted for morrum & ordinary earth contradicts claim of earthwork-only contract. (Paras 14, 20-25)

Facts of the case:
Applicants alleged contractor for third line railway track illegally extracted ~20 lakh cum morrum from specified plots including revenue forest land without environmental clearance, mining plan approval, or pollution board consent; prior royalties/penalties paid for violations. Joint committee inspected sites, confirmed excavations via survey, noted absence of clearances, calculated compensation and dues.

Findings of Court:
Illegal extractions proven against contractor from permitted and forest-classified plots; environmental violations established sans clearances; recovery of environmental compensation left to state authorities; interlocutory applications by violator rejected.

Issues: Whether extractions were illegal sans environmental clearance; applicability of forest conservation laws to revenue forest land; NGT jurisdiction over minor mineral penalties; need for impleading other contractors.

Ratio Decidendi: Revenue forest land (dictionary sense/post-1980 records) attracts Forest (Conservation) Act restrictions; environmental violations within NGT remit under Section 14, but concession rule penalties outside; contractor liable despite contract terming 'earthwork' given mining plan for morrum.

Result: Original Application disposed directing state respondents to recover environmental compensation; I.A. for quashing enquiry report disposed; I.A. for dismissal rejected.

Table of Content
1. illegal morrum extraction without ec (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 8)
2. committee verifies site violations (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. contract requires earth sourcing compliance (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. respondent denies illegal mining (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. court confirms habitual illegal excavation (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
6. ngt jurisdiction limited to environment (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
7. direct recovery of ec against violator (Para 36 , 37 , 38)

ORDER

1. Mr. Sankar Prasad Pani, assisted by Mr. Ashutosh Padhy, learned Counsel is present (in Virtual Mode) on behalf of the Applicants.

2. The allegation in the present Original Application is that the Respondent Nos.13 is constructing a 3rd line railway track from Bhadrak to Nergundi for which the earthbed is constructed by taking earth/Morrum from various places including Plot No.1606, Khata No.529 under Mania village, Khata No.530, Plot No.48 and Khata No.532, Plot No.550 under the Panchayat Uchapada under Tangi Choudwar Tahasil. It is alleged that about 20 lakh cubic meters of Morrum has been illegally lifted/extracted from various places in Cuttack district. Allegation also is that illegal Morrum mining being carried out on Revenue Forest Land of different villages and trees have been felled by the Respondent No.13 for mining Morrum.

3. It is also alleged that for construction of the railway line, thousands of truckloads of Morrum have been illegally lifted by the Respondent No.13 in Tangi-Choudwar Tahasil without any valid permission or N.O.C. from the Uchapada Gram Panchayat under Tangi-Choudwar Tahasil. It is also alleged that vide Receipt dated 27.05.2020, the Tahasildar had collected royalty of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees one lakh fifty thousand only) and penalty of Rs.49,500/- (Rupees forty-nine thousand five hundred only) from the Respondent No.13 for illegally extracted Morrum. The details of the Khata and Plot of the land from where the Morrum and Soil are alleged to have been lifted in Tangi Choudwar Tahasil are given in a Table in para 15 which reads as under: -

“Sl. No.KisamKhata No.Plot No.
1Jungle two532550
2Patita5291606
3Uncultivable waste land53048”

4. It is alleged that Morrum is a minor mineral and cannot be lifted from source without a Environmental Clearance issued by the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA for short), with Approved Mining Plan and Consent from the State Pollution Control Board but no such documents are there in the present case for carrying out the illegal mining of Morrum.

5. At the time of admission, this Tribunal constituted a Committee comprising of the following members:-

i) Senior Scientist, Odisha State Pollution Control Board;

ii) District Mining Officer, Cuttack;

iii) District Collector, Cuttack or his representative Officer not below the rank of Additional District Magistrate (A.D.M.); and

iv) Divisional Forest Officer, Cuttack

6. The Committee was directed to visit the site and submit its report with regard to the allegations made in the Original Application.

7. The Respondent No.9, State Pollution Control Board, Odisha, has filed affidavit dated 09.02.2024 and along with this affidavit, an Inspection Report of an inspection of the site carried out on 18.12.2023 has been filed which reads as under:-

“REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CONSTITUTED BY THE HON’BLE NGT VIDE THEIR ORDER DTD. 23.11.2023, IN THE MATTER OF OA NO. 167/2023/EZ- SRIKANTA KUMAR PAKAL & ORS VERSUS STATE OF ODISHA & ORS

I. BACKGROUND:

1. An application has been filed by Srikanta Kumar Pakal & Ors before the Hon’ble NGT, EZB vide OA No.167/2023/EZ alleging that the Respondent No. 13 i.e., M/s. Shanti Construction Pvt. Limited is constructing a third line railway track from Bhadrak. to Nergundi for which the earthbed is constructed by taking earth/morrum from various places including Plot No.1606 of Khata No.529, Plot No.48 of Khata No.530 and Plot No.550 of Khata No.532 under Mania Village, Tangi-Choudwar Tahasil of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top