Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan vs State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4335

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Applicant(s): Mr. Arvind Nayyar, Sr. Adv., Mr. R.K. Agarwal, Sr. Adv. (with Mr. Aman Jha, Adv.), Mr. Pratap Thakur, Adv., Mr. Rishi Tutu, Adv.
For Respondent(s): Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Sr. Adv. (Mr. Shoeb Hasan Khan, Adv., Mr. Rishabh Kumar, Adv. and Mr. Samresh Katare, Adv.), Mr. Arvind Verma, Sr. Adv., Mr. R.B. Mathur, Sr. Adv. (with Achint Kumar, Adv.), Mr. Om Shankar Shrivastava, Adv., Mr. Sachin K. Verma, Adv. (with Ms. Harshita Tejwani, Adv.), Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv., Mr. Ravikant Patidar, Adv., Mr. Sandeep Singh Patidar, Adv., Mr. Prateek Singh Baghel, Adv.

Table of Content
1. hearing proceedings and filings noted. (Para 1 , 2)
2. e-auctions violate emgsm-2020 clustering rules. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. intervenors claim misrepresentation in auctions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. high court upheld dsr compliance and auctions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. supreme court directs cec compliance for mining. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
6. seac/seiaa approved dsrs per guidelines. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
7. inspections confirm auction plot compliance. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
8. dsr mandatory prerequisite for sustainable mining. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
9. dsr approved; plots delineated per sop. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
10. intervenors lack locus; contractual disputes excluded. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55)
11. enforce ssmg-2016/emgsm-2020 guidelines strictly. (Para 56)
12. application disposed per higher court orders. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61)

ORDER

1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the record.

2. The respondent has filed the reply and applicant has filed the rejoinder to the reply filed by Respondent no. 1 and Respondent no. 2. I.A. No. 88/2024 to 95/2024 an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4335

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert MemberDr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent