Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan vs State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4395

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Applicant(s): Mr. Arvind Nayyar, Sr. Adv., Mr. R.K. Agarwal, Sr. Adv. (with Mr. Aman Jha, Adv.), Mr. Pratap Thakur, Adv., Mr. Rishi Tutu, Adv.
For Respondent(s): Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Sr. Adv. (Mr. Shoeb Hasan Khan, Adv., Mr. Rishabh Kumar, Adv. and Mr. Samresh Katare, Adv.), Mr. Arvind Verma, Sr. Adv., Mr. R.B. Mathur, Sr. Adv. (with Achint Kumar, Adv.), Mr. Om Shankar Shrivastava, Adv., Mr. Sachin K. Verma, Adv. (with Ms. Harshita Tejwani, Adv.), Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv., Mr. Ravikant Patidar, Adv., Mr. Sandeep Singh Patidar, Adv., Mr. Prateek Singh Baghel, Adv.

Table of Content
1. procedural hearing and filings noted. (Para 1 , 2)
2. e-auctions violate dsr and emgsm cluster rules. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. intervenors claim misrepresentation in auctions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. high court upheld dsr validity and auctions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. supreme court directs cec compliance for mining. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
6. seac/seiaa approved dsrs with conditions. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
7. inspections confirm auction plot compliance. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
8. emgsm mandates dsr before auctions. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
9. supreme court affirms balanced sand mining. (Para 31 , 32)
10. dsr approved; plots delineated per sop. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
11. intervenors lack locus post-auction participation. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)
12. i.as. dismissed as contractual matters. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55)
13. enforce ssmg/emgsm; oa disposed per court orders. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61)

ORDER

1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the record.

2. The respondent has filed the reply and applicant has filed the rejoinder to the reply filed by Respondent no. 1 and Respondent no. 2. I.A.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4395

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert MemberDr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent