SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4437

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Utpal Saikia – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
Original Application No. 808/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: None
For the Respondents: Raj Kumar

NGT directs impleadment of parties, accepts Joint Committee report recommending shift of non-compliant brick kilns from proposed eco-sensitive zone of wildlife sanctuary, pending boundary rationalization and ESZ notification.

Headnote:(A) National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Sections 14 and 15 - Environmental protection - Wildlife sanctuary - Proposed eco-sensitive zone - Brick kilns using coal and conventional technology operating near periphery of wildlife sanctuary - Prima facie violation of pollution control norms and eco-sensitive zone guidelines - Joint Committee constituted to verify facts and submit report - Committee found units within 100m to 892m from sanctuary boundary, non-compliant with zig-zag technology mandate, using agricultural soil and coal - No cement factories observed - Ongoing proceedings in higher courts on boundary rationalization and eco-sensitive zone declaration - Tribunal accepts Committee recommendations for survey, regulation, shifting of polluting units outside proposed zone, adoption of green technology, monitoring, and awareness - Additional respondents impleaded and matter transferred to Eastern Zone Bench. (Paras 1 to 11)

(B) Eco-sensitive zone guidelines - MoEF&CC notification dated 09.02.2011 - Prohibited activities include setting of polluting industries; regulated activities include hotels/resorts per master plan - Declaration of eco-sensitive zone essential to resolve recurring issues balancing environment, wildlife habitat and development - Activities within 1km to be closed/regulated/shifted post boundary rationalization approved by Supreme Court. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
Suo moto original application registered on letter petition alleging establishment of industrial zone including brick kilns using coal, cement factories and stone quarries amidst blocks of wildlife sanctuary rich in biodiversity. Forest officials reported brick kiln 500m from sanctuary boundary within proposed eco-sensitive zone. Joint Committee visited site, inspected specific brick kilns, noted distances, technologies, fuel use, and recommended consolidated regulatory approach pending eco-sensitive zone notification.

Findings of Court:
Joint Committee report accepted; polluting brick kilns and establishments to be surveyed, regulated or shifted outside proposed eco-sensitive zone; only compliant green technology units allowed outside zone; air quality monitoring, e-vehicles, waste management directed; matter transferred to Eastern Zone Bench, Kolkata for further proceedings on 10.12.2024.

Issues: Whether brick kilns and other establishments near wildlife sanctuary violate eco-sensitive zone guidelines; need for declaration/notification of eco-sensitive zone and rationalization of sanctuary boundary; appropriate action against non-compliant polluting units.

Ratio Decidendi: Effective environmental protection requires notification of eco-sensitive zones around wildlife sanctuaries to prohibit polluting industries and regulate activities; case-by-case adjudication insufficient, consolidated survey and regulatory measures necessary post boundary finalization; non-compliant units using conventional technology and coal in proximity to sanctuary must shift outside proposed zone adopting green fuels/technologies.

Result: Application not finally disposed; additional respondents impleaded, notices issued, record transferred to Eastern Zone Bench, Kolkata; listed on 10.12.2024.

Table of Content
1. complaint of polluting industries near pobitora wildlife sanctuary. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. joint committee report details brick kilns violations. (Para 6 , 7)
3. implead parties for comprehensive environmental compliance. (Para 8)
4. transfer case to eastern zone bench. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)

ORDER

1. This original application was registered under Section 14 and 15 of National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NGT Act, 2010’) exercising suo moto jurisdiction on a letter petition dated 19.10.2023 received from Utpal Saikia and others.

2. Complainants have stated that Pobitora Wildlife Sanctuary comprised of 2 blocks and a rich biodiversity with more than 103 one horned Rhinos, 300 Indian Buffaloes, Leopards, Deers, Pangolins, Wild boars etc., besides migratory birds.

3. One Dilip Chetry, an industrialist, is creating an industrial zone amidst 2 Blocks of Pobitora Wildlife Sanctuary and trying to establish brick-kiln using coal a fuel. It is also said that attend is also been made to establish cement factories and stone quarries in the said area.

4. A Report of Forest Range Officer, Pobitora Wildlife Range sent to Regional Forest Officer vide letter dated 04.05.2023 has also been appended to the said complaint wherein Forest Range Officer has reported that he found brick-kiln at Sativeti area on 01.05.2023 which is surrounded by paddy fields of villagers and is about 500 meters away from the boundary of Rajamayog hill point of Wildlife Sanctuary and falls within proposed eco-sensitive zone of protected area.

5. Further letter dated 04.03.2024 sent by Divisional Forest Officer to Assam State Pollution Control Board has also been placed on record whereby Divisional Forest Officer forwarded inventory report of industries situated in the proposed eco-sensitive zone of Pobitora Wildlife Sanctuary as received from Range Officer, Pobitora Wildlife Range. Vide letter dated 15.01.2024, Forest Officer stated that sanctuary is constituted of two reserve forests namely Bada Mayang Reserve Forest (area 1191.86 hectares) and Pobitora Reserve Forest (area 1584.76 hectares) and government land (area 1104 hectare). The said area was declared as wildlife Sanctuary by the Government of Assam’s notification dated 17.03.1998. Proposed eco-sensitive zone of Pobitora Wildlife Sanctuary includes an extent area of one kilometer radius from the periphery of wildlife sanctuary as also Intermediate States between the above Reserve Forest and government land. Industries enlisted by Range Officer, Pobitora Wildlife Range are situated within the said proposed eco sensitive zone of Pobitora Wildlife Sanctuary. Divisional Forest Officer had requested Chairman Assam State Pollution Control Board to take appropriate action in the matter.

6. Tribunal considered complaint on 27.08.2024 and formed an opinion prima facie that effective action was not taken in matter on complaint and offending industries are still operating in questioned area. However, to verify the facts, Tribunal found it appropriate to obtain a factual report and thus constituted a Joint Committee comprising representative of Secretary, Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change, New Delhi; Member Secretary, Assam State Pollution Control Board; representative of Central Pollution Control Board; and Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Wildlife, Assam.

7. Joint Committee now has submitted report vide email dated 04.11.2024. It is said that site was visited on 18.10.2024 by Joint Committee who found a number of brick kilns and other establishments like resorts, hotels etc. located near periphery of Pobitora Wildlife Sanctuary. Observations/ action taken and recommendations of Committee read as under:-

“2.2 Actions Taken by the Committee:

The committee visited the site on 18.10.2024 and observed number of Brick Kilns and other establishments like resorts, hotels, ete. located near the periphery of Pobitora Wildlife Sanctuary (WLS). However, the committee decided to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top