Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, A Senthil Vel, Expert Member
Chandikant Jha – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants allege improper fly ash disposal polluting rivers and areas. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. tribunal directs monitoring and compliance; application disposed. (Para 3 , 4 , 51 , 52) |
| 3. plant has consents and permissions for ash disposal in mines and low-lying areas. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 32) |
| 4. compliance measures prevent pollution; inspections confirm no violations. (Para 11 , 12 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. fly ash utilization follows moefcc 2021 notification and cpcb guidelines. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. application barred by res judicata, forum shopping, and lack of locus standi. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. state and moefcc affirm 100% eco-friendly ash utilization compliance. (Para 29 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 8. applicants' health and drainage claims refuted by committee findings. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
ORDER
1. The grievance of the applicant is inaction on the part of the Respondent no. 11 in handling, treatment and disposal of fly ash waste generated by Moser Baer Thermal Power Plant Anuppur (Madhya Pradesh). Anuppur Thermal Power project is coal based thermal power project in Anuppur dis
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
