SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4660

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL KOLKATA (EASTERN ZONE BENCH)
B. Amit Sthalekar, J, Arun Kumar Verma, Expert Member
Monoj Hazarika – Appellant
Versus
Bonani Kakkar – Respondent
Miscellaneous Application No. 31/2023/EZ|Original Application No.43/2020/EZ



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Devansh Mohta, Vikram Rajkhowa
For the Respondents: Sridhar Potaraju, Petal Chandhok, Vivek Singh, Ashok Prasad, Amrita Pandey, Malabika Roy Dey

Severely damaged houses do not qualify for compensation category meant for completely gutted houses; additional families reclassified to lower tier, with advances adjustable against final compensation.

Headnote:(A) National Green Tribunal - Interim compensation - Oil blowout incident causing damage to houses, livelihood, crops, livestock - Expert Committee categorized affected families into three categories: (i) houses completely gutted - Rs.25 lakhs; (ii) houses severely damaged - Rs.10 lakhs; (iii) moderately/partially damaged - Rs.2.5 lakhs - Subsequent recommendations by District Administration and Committee to expand Category-I to include severely damaged houses and enhance Category-II to Rs.20 lakhs - Tribunal holds additional 161 families with severely damaged houses do not qualify for Category-I (Rs.25 lakhs) benefits as they differ from 12 families with completely gutted houses - Treating unequals as equals not permissible - Advance payments of Rs.15 lakhs to these 161 families and Rs.10 lakhs to 439 Category-II families stand adjusted against final compensation - No further interim amounts payable. (Paras 50-63)

(B) Environmental compensation - Adjudication principles - Higher compensation requires evidence of loss; floor level can be directed on guesswork - Interim payments non-recoverable but adjustable against final compensation - Final claims to be adjudicated on merits with evidence in pending proceedings. (Paras 23, 65)

Facts of the case:
Miscellaneous Application seeking directions for balance interim compensation: Rs.10 lakhs each to 161 families in expanded Category-I (Rs.25 lakhs total less Rs.15 lakhs paid) and 439 families in Category-II (Rs.20 lakhs total less Rs.10 lakhs paid) following oil well blowout and explosion causing extensive damage - Arising from Original Application on incident; prior Expert Committee reports, tripartite meetings, partial payments, Supreme Court remands clarifying no embargo on claims.

Findings of Court:
Only 12 families entitled to Rs.25 lakhs under Category-I (completely gutted houses); additional 161 families with severely damaged houses fall in Category-II (Rs.10 lakhs entitlement) - Total Category-II families: 600 - No further interim compensation due as Rs.10 lakhs already fully paid to 439; excess advance to 161 adjustable against final compensation.

Issues: Whether additional 161 families with severely damaged houses qualify for Category-I Rs.25 lakhs interim compensation; entitlement of Category-II families to enhanced Rs.20 lakhs; scope of Expert Committee recommendations vis-à-vis original Tribunal categorization.

Ratio Decidendi: Original categorization binding; severely damaged houses do not equate to completely gutted for higher compensation tier - Recommendations subject to Tribunal scrutiny; advance payments under duress do not admit higher liability - Final compensation adjudication requires evidence, unaffected by interim directions.

Result: Miscellaneous Application rejected.

Table of Content
1. baghjan oil blowout incident background (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. ngt interim compensation categories established (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. supreme court remands for compensation disbursement (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. oil payments and ngt observations on resolution (Para 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. oil contests expanded category-i categorization (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
6. supreme court clarifies no embargo on claims (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48)
7. court rejects additional category-ii claims (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56)
8. 161 families reclassified to category-ii (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65)
9. ma rejected; final compensation pending (Para 66 , 67 , 68)

JUDGMENT

PRESENT:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. AMIT STHALEKAR (JUDICIAL MEMBER)

HON’BLE DR. ARUN KUMAR VERMA (EXPERT MEMBER)

__________________________________________________________________

Reserved On:-06th December, 2024 Pronounce On:- 13th December, 2024

 __________________________________________________________________

1. Whether the Judgment is allowed to be published on the net? Yes

2. Whether the Judgment is allowed to be published in the NGT Reporter? Yes

Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicants and the learned Counsel for the Respondents and perused the documents on record.

2. The present Miscellaneous Application No.31/2023/EZ has been filed by the Applicant, seeking the following reliefs: -

(i) “direct the respondents to expeditiously disburse the balance interim compensation amount of Rs.10.00 lakhs per family to the 161 families in Category-I, i.e. Rs.25.00 lakhs (-) less advance Rs.15.00 lakhs = Rs.10.00 lakhs per family, and/or

(ii) direct the respondents to expeditiously disburse the balance interim compensation amount of Rs.10.00 lakhs per family to the 439 families in Category-II, i.e., Rs.20.00 lakhs (-) less advance Rs.10.00 lakhs = Rs.10.00 lakhs per family, and/or

(iii) grant such other consequential reliefs pertaining to “interim compensation” that this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper, including interest on the ‘interim compensation’ amount being due, and/or

(iv) pass any other such order(s)/direction(s) as this Hon’ble Tribunal seem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the present case.”

3. The Original Application No. 43/2020/EZ (Bonani Kakkar Vs. Oil India Limited) was taken up by the National Green Tribunal, New Delhi Bench, in respect of an incident relating to destruction and damage caused by the oil blowout and explosion that took place in BGN-5 Oil Well at Baghjan, Assam, stated to be due to the acts and omissions of the Oil India Limited.

4. The National Green Tribunal vide its order dated 24.06.2020 constituted a Committee of Experts headed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. P. Katakey, former Judge of the Guwahati High Court. A Preliminary Report dated 24.07.2020 was submitted by the Experts Committee before the National Green Tribunal, New Delhi Bench.

5. It is stated that the Committee was of the unanimous view that blowout and the subsequent explosion has led to extensive damage to the public owned resources and has also caused irreparable harm and damage to private owned property of the survivors in the affected villages.

6. The National Green Tribunal, New Delhi Bench vide its order dated 06.08.2020 observed that the Experts Committee assessed the interim compensation payable to the affected villagers and passed recommendation which is as under: -

“Preliminary Interim Measures IV. Interim Compensation to the affected families

1. The Committee, proposes the formulation of three categories of affected families to assess the question of interim compensation namely;

(i) Those whose houses have been completely gutted by the fire thereby causing grave injury to life and health, loss of livelihood, cultivable land, livestock, damage to standing crops and horticulture, fisheries etc.

(ii) Those whose houses have

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top