Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, Chairperson, ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, Judicial Member, A. SENTHIL VEL, Expert Member
BALBIR SANDHU – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant challenges mining plan approvals violating dsr. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. mining plans exceed dsr mineral capacity and area limits. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. joint committee identifies dsr discrepancies and no mining. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. respondents defend approvals citing dsr errors. (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. dsr prepared; lois and plans approved post-auction. (Para 20 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106) |
| 6. tribunal frames issues on limitation, locus, affidavits. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. delay condoned; application within limitation. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. locus standi upheld for environmental public interest. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 9. affidavit irregularities not fatal to pleadings. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 10. approvals violate original dsr limits and guidelines. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 11. unregulated mining harms river ecology; ec mandatory. (Para 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64) |
| 12. dsr preparation and public consultation required. (Para 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74) |
| 13. ssmg-2016 and emgsm-2020 mandate sustainable mi |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
