SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 1001

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
VIKRANT TONGAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


JUDGMENT

BY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1. This Original Application (hereinafter referred to as ‘OA’) has been preferred by Vikrant Tongad and Dr. Supriya Mahajan. Both are residents of District Gautam Budh Nagar, State of Uttar Pradesh. It is alleged that there is huge damage to environment due to reckless, excessive and indiscriminate concretisation of road sides and roadberms, carried out by New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as ‘NOIDA’) in Sectors 28, 37, 47, 50, 55 and 62 and by Greater Noida Authority (hereinafter referred to as ‘G NOIDA’) in Sectors Omega 1, Alpha and P3. The said authorities are also violating orders of Tribunal passed in OA 165/2013, Ashish Vashishtha vs. Union of India & Ors. and also, Government Order dated 23.03.2018 issued by State of UP and concurred by Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (hereinafter referred to as ‘MoEF&CC’) in Execution Application No. 34/2017 in OA 165/2013, Akash Vashishtha vs. Union of India & Ors. Act of these authorities is also in gross violation of judgment dated 10.11.2016 passed in OA 21/2014, Vardhaman Kaushik vs. Union of India & Ors. and dated 03.12.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top