SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 1366

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CHENNAI (SOUTHERN ZONE BENCH)
Smt. Pushpa Sathyanarayana, J, Dr. SATYAGOPAL KORLAPATI, ACJ
MUHAMMED RISHAM – Appellant
Versus
1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFFICE KOZHIKODE COLLECTORATE – Respondent
Original Application No.188 of 2024 (SZ) | I.A. No.138 & 144 of 2024 (SZ)



Advocates:
For the Applicant: Mr. V.B.R. Menon
For the Respondents: Mr. G. Vignesh, Mr. R. Thirunavukarasu, Mrs. V.K. Rema Smrithi, Mr. S. Janarthanam, M/s. C. Mohan & M. Kumaresan, M/s. R. Sunil Kumar & A. Salini Lal

The establishment of petroleum retail outlets must adhere to distance criteria from residential areas as set out in safety guidelines to protect public safety.

Headnote:(A) Environment Protection Act, 1986 - Sections related to establishment of petroleum retail outlet - Central Pollution Control Board guidelines dated 07.01.2020 - Guidelines stipulating distance from residential areas - Establishment of fuel station within 30 Meters in violation of guidelines - The proposed site is to comply with distance criteria provided therein. (Paras 1-6, 15-34)

(B) Safeguarding public safety - Need for a clear determination of designated residential areas when granting approvals for hazardous establishments - Court emphasized the necessity of modified guidelines to protect residents in non-designated residential areas. (Paras 32-34)

Facts of the case:
The applicant challenges the establishment of a petroleum retail outlet alleging it violates distance criteria from residential buildings as per CPCB guidelines. Despite complaints, no action was taken by authorities.

Findings of Court:
The area predominantly consists of residential houses; therefore, approval for the retail outlet violates CPCB siting criteria due to insufficient distance from residential structures.

Issues: The main issue is whether the proposed site for the retail outlet violates CPCB guidelines regarding the proximity to residential areas.

Ratio Decidendi: The guidelines are applicable, and the residential nature of the area requires adherence to safety measures outlined in the CPCB guidelines to safeguard residents.

Result: The application is disposed of directing the PCA and SPCB to review the situation and modify guidelines for safety considerations.

Table of Content
1. applicant challenges petrol outlet establishment near residential area. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. authorities justify noc issuance based on inspections. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. determination of designated residential area critical for compliance. (Para 11 , 12 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. importance of public safety in siting criteria application. (Para 22 , 23 , 25 , 26)
5. guidelines and residential proximity must ensure public safety. (Para 28 , 30 , 31)
6. court directs cpcb to modify existing guidelines. (Para 32 , 33 , 34)

JUDGEMENT

Delivered by Smt. Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, Judicial Member

1. This is yet another application challenging the establishment of a petroleum retail outlet based on the siting criteria guidelines issued by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB).

2. The applicant is a resident of Naduvannur Village, residing at Sy. No.12/163 of Naduvannur Post, Koyilandi Taluk, Kozhikode District. He is aggrieved by the establishment of a fuel station at Sy. No.198 of Naduvannur Village, Koyilandi Taluk, which is adjacent to the applicant’s house.

3. Since no fruitful actions were taken by the authorities despite several complaints submitted by him, the present Original Application has been filed.

4. According to him, there are several residential buildings in that area and residential buildings are also being constructed. There is also a registered society named ‘Suraksha Residents Association’. Quoting the siting criteria for setting up of a new petroleum retail outlet, as issued by the CPCB in its Office Memorandum (O.M.) dated 07.01.2020, the applicant has alleged that the proposed fuel station has obtained license from the Petroleum & Explosives Safety Organization (PESO) on 12.08.2021, violating the siting criteria.

5. Admittedly, the petroleum retail outlet of Respondent No.6 is within 30 Meters, which is roughly 2.5 meters from the unit, which is in violation of the O.M. dated 07.01.2020. The No Objection Certification (NOC) was issued by the District Collector based on the direction given by the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in W.P. 19348 of 2023. Since the PESO license as well as the NOC were obtained by the 6th Respondent after the guidelines dated 07.01.2020 was issued, the petroleum retail outlet has to be in strict adherence to the distance mentioned therein.

6. As the distance criteria is not complied with, the above Original Application is filed for taking action against Respondents No.5 & 6 and restraining them from setting up a petroleum retail outlet.

7. The District Collector – Kozhikode/Respondent No.1, in his reply affidavit, has stated that based on the report of the Tahsildar – Koyilandi who has mentioned that there are no schools, petrol bunks, hospitals and railway canals located within a radial distance of 50 Meters from the proposed petrol pump, NOC was issued. He has stated that as per the letter of the Joint Director, Local Self Government Department dated 22.06.2023, there is no approved master plan or detailed town planning project in Naduvannur Gram Panchayat at present. Besides, the Hon’ble High Court had directed the District Collector - Kozhikode to take an independent decision for granting NOC without waiting for consent from the Kerala SPCB or NOC from any other authority concerned. In light of the said direction only, the NOC was issued by the District Collector.

8. The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)/ Respondent No.2, in its reply, has stated that as per Guidelines dated 07.01.2020 for setting up of new petrol pumps/ retail outlets, the same shall not be located within 50 Meters (from fill point/ dispensing unit/ vent pipe whichever is nearest) from schools, hospitals, and residential areas designated as per local laws. It is also mandated that in case of constraints in complying with 50-meter distance criteria, the retail outlet shall implement additional safety measures as prescribed by PESO. The guidelines further insisted on at-least 30 meters of d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top