Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PUNE (WESTERN ZONE BENCH)
Dinesh Kumar Singh, J, Vijay Kulkarni, EM
Sadguru Raghuveer Pednekar & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
GCZMA & Anr. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application of proper notification in ongoing legal proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. setting procedural timelines for case responses. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. dismissing motions that are no longer pressed. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. planning future hearings for unresolved appeals. (Para 8) |
ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants has filed service affidavit dated 12.07.2025 today, hard copy of which is taken on record. We direct the Registry to place the said service-affidavit, which has been e-filed by the appellants, as stated by the learned counsel, immediately. As per the said service-affidavit, service on all the respondents is sufficient.
2. From the side of respondent No.5, learned counsel Mr. Ankur Kumar has appeared, who says that the conduct of the applicants is not proper because Writ Petition No.1716 of 2025 (F) (Anil Prabhakar Naik Vs. The Collector and District Magistrate (North) and 3 Ors.) has been filed by respondent No.5 before the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa, whereby the implementation of the order dated 28.02.2025, passed by respondent No.1 – GCZMA, which is impugned in this appeal, was sought. After consideration of the same, a direction was iss
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
