NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Prakash Shrivastava, Chairperson, Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, A. Senthil Vel, Expert Member
Ajayveer Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to illegal sand mining auctions without dsr. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 10) |
| 2. prior ec mandatory; dsr and replenishment study required. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. respondents claim dsr amendments and ec approvals. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. locus standi and limitation upheld for applicant. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. oa falls under section 15 ngt act; within limitation. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 6. mining leases lack valid dsr approval. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 7. eia 2006 mandates prior ec procedure. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68) |
| 8. eia amendments enforce dsr and ec requirements. (Para 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82) |
| 9. dsr approval by eiaa mandatory for validity. (Para 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89) |
| 10. ssmg-2016/emgsm-2020 require valid dsr. (Para 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104) |
| 11. supreme court/ngt affirm dsr as ec prerequisite. (Para 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.