SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 1663

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PUNE (WESTERN ZONE BENCH)
MR. DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J, DR. VIJAY KULKARNI, ACJ
Tanaji B. Gambhire – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Vijay Mhaske, Ms. Pradnya Bheke, Mr. Nitin Lonkar
For the Respondents: Mr. Pushkal Mishra, Mr. Aniruddha Kulkarni, Mr. Savyasachi Bharadwaj, Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar, Ms. Disha Shetty, Mr. Pinaki Mishra, Mr. Rajat Jariwal, Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Ms. Prerna Singh, Mr. Saurabh Kulkarni, Mr. Adwait Gokhale, Mr. Robin Vakil, Ms. Sonam Mhatre, Mr. Amit Mishra, Mr. Chaitanya Chavan, Mr. Sachin Gagan, Mr. Vaibhav Jathar, Mr. R.B. Mahabal, Ms. Supriya Dangare, Mr. Nitin P. Deshpande, Mr. Maitreya P. Ghorpade, Mr. Ameya Patwardhan, Mr. Parimal Deshmukh, Mr. Rohit Gangawane, Mr. Nilesh Bhandari, Mr. Akash Kumawat, Mr. Vidyesh Dhamdhere, Mr. Saket Mone, Ms. Anchita Nair, Ms. Varsha Joshi, Mr. Angad Singh Gill, Mr. Sagar Jagdhane, Dr. Shrikant Kamat

Table of Content
1. environmental clearances were challenged based on the operation of seiaa. (Para 1 , 2)
2. response from seiaa addressing the legitimacy of ec issuance procedures. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. procedural timelines in the environmental clearance process are significant. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. confirmation of seiaa’s legal standing to issue ec before term expiration. (Para 12 , 13)
5. final directions set forth for the seiaa regarding procedural compliance. (Para 14 , 15)

ORDER

1. All these appeals are being disposed of by this common order as the issues involved therein and the grounds raised while assailing the impugned Environmental Clearances are identical.

2. By filing these appeals, the appellants have challenged the Environmental Clearances (ECs) dated 02.02.2024, 06.02.2024, 07.02.2024 and 08.02.2024, issued by respondent No.2 – State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Maharashtra in favour of respondent No.4 – Project Proponent in respective appeals for the project, details of which have been mentioned in respective ECs, annexed to each of these appeals, mainly on the ground that on the date when the impugned ECs have been granted, SEIAA was not in o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top