Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PUNE (WESTERN ZONE BENCH)
Dinesh Kumar Singh, J, Dr. Vijay Kulkarni, ACJ
Uttam Manohar Mokal – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. continuations of hearings reflecting regulatory scrutiny. (Para 1 , 2 , 12) |
| 2. effluent discharge and admission of contamination by project proponent. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. accountability for both distillery and sugar unit operations under shared ownership. (Para 6) |
| 4. zld achievement by the distillery and environmental compensation directive. (Para 21) |
| 5. final decision to dispose of the application with directives. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
ORDER
1. We are passing this order in continuation to the earlier orders dated 14.11.2024, 20.01.2025, 07.03.2025 and 16.06.2025.
2. Today, learned counsel for the applicant has filed rejoinder affidavit dated 14.07.2025 to the Joint Committee Report dated 01.03.2025 and Affidavits-in-Reply filed by Respondents Nos.2 & 4.
3. As regards the reply affidavit of Respondent No.4- M/s Karamveer Shankarrao Kale Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (Distillery Division), it is submitted in the rejoinder affidavit by the applicant that Respondent No.4- Project Proponent has admitted discharging the effluent on the land in question. Even the Joint Committee has observed that effluent, generated by the Project Proponent, has been discharged on the land and t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
