Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, A Senthil Vel, Expert Member
Chandikant Jha – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants allege improper fly ash disposal polluting rivers and areas. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. power plant has consents and permissions for ash disposal in mines and low-lying areas. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 32) |
| 3. inspections confirm compliance with dust suppression and pollution controls. (Para 11 , 12 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. fly ash utilization complies with moefcc 2021 notification and cpcb guidelines. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. applicants' complaints dismissed due to prior resolutions and forum shopping. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. joint committee verifies eco-friendly ash disposal without environmental harm. (Para 29 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. state promotes fly ash utilization through notifications and review meetings. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 8. applicants' health and road damage claims refuted by compliance evidence. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 9. direct ongoing monitoring and maintenance; application disposed. (Para 51 , 52) |
ORDER
1. The grievance of the applicant is inaction on the part of the Respondent no. 11 in handling, treatment and disposal of fly ash waste generated by Moser Baer Thermal Power Plant An
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
