NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Prakash Shrivastava, Chairperson, Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, A. Senthil Vel, Expert Member
Ajayveer Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to e-auction notices without valid dsr (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. precedents mandating dsr and replenishment studies (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. respondents' procedural compliance claims (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. framing issues for adjudication (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. applicant's locus standi upheld (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. oa maintainable under section 15 ngt act (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 46) |
| 7. no appeal required for e-auction challenge (Para 47) |
| 8. mining leases lack valid dsr inclusion (Para 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 9. eia 2006 mandates prior ec procedures (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88) |
| 10. ngt precedents enforce dsr requirements (Para 89 , 90 , 91 , 92) |
| 11. dsr mandatory prerequisite for ec (Para 93 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122) |
| 12. mining restrained; compensation ordered (Para 123 , |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.