SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4990

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL KOLKATA (EASTERN ZONE BENCH)
B. Amit Sthalekar, Judicial Member, Arun Kumar Verma, Expert Member
Monoj Hazarika – Appellant
Versus
Bonani Kakkar – Respondent
Miscellaneous Application No. 31/2023/EZ|Original Application No.43/2020/EZ



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Devansh Mohta, Mr. Vikram Rajkhowa
For the Respondents: Mr. Sridhar Potaraju, Ms. Petal Chandhok, Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. Ashok Prasad, Ms. Amrita Pandey, Ms. Malabika Roy Dey

Severely damaged houses cannot be equated with completely gutted ones for higher interim compensation; original Tribunal categorization prevails over subsequent expansions; advance payments do not admit higher liability.

Headnote:(A) National Green Tribunal - Interim compensation - Oil blowout incident causing damage to houses, life, health, livelihood, land, livestock, crops, fisheries - Original categorization: Category-I (houses completely gutted: Rs.25 lakhs), Category-II (severely damaged: Rs.10 lakhs), Category-III (partially damaged: Rs.2.5 lakhs) - Subsequent proposals by local authority to expand Category-I to include severely damaged houses and proximity criterion (0-1.5 km), accepted by experts committee recommending Rs.25 lakhs (173 families) and Rs.20 lakhs (439 families) - Partial payments made: Rs.25 lakhs to initial 12 families, Rs.15 lakhs advance to additional 161, Rs.10 lakhs to 439 - Held: Additional 161 families with severely damaged houses cannot be equated with completely gutted houses; they fall in Category-II entitled to Rs.10 lakhs only; no further interim compensation payable as amounts already disbursed; final compensation to be determined separately on evidence. (Paras 50-66)

(B) Judicial review - Acceptance of expert recommendations - Subject to Tribunal's scrutiny; cannot equate unequals (severely damaged vs. completely gutted houses); advance payments do not constitute admission of higher liability. (Paras 60-62)

Facts of the case:
Miscellaneous application seeking balance interim compensation (Rs.10 lakhs each) for 161 Category-I families (Rs.25 lakhs total minus Rs.15 lakhs paid) and 439 Category-II families (Rs.20 lakhs total minus Rs.10 lakhs paid) after oil blowout incident. Dispute over categorization expansion and enhanced amounts proposed post-initial Tribunal order.

Findings of Court:
Only initial 12 families entitled to Rs.25 lakhs under Category-I; additional 161 families re-categorized to Category-II (total 600 families entitled to Rs.10 lakhs, already paid); no further interim amounts due; final compensation pending separate adjudication.

Issues: Whether additional families with severely damaged houses qualify for Category-I compensation of Rs.25 lakhs; entitlement to balance Rs.10 lakhs in expanded Category-II at Rs.20 lakhs.

Ratio Decidendi: Tribunal's original categorization prevails; severely damaged houses fall in Category-II (Rs.10 lakhs), not upgradable to Category-I (Rs.25 lakhs) based on local proposals or proximity; unequals cannot be treated as equals; prior advances adjusted against final compensation.

Result: Miscellaneous application rejected.

Table of Content
1. baghjan oil blowout incident and initial ngt interim compensation directives (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. deputy commissioner's revised categorization and expert committee recommendations (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. ngt closure, supreme court remand for interim compensation disbursement (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. oil's payments, objections, and prior ngt observations on compensation (Para 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. oil arguments against expanded category-i based on damage assessment (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
6. supreme court and ngt directions clarifying interim compensation claims (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)
7. rejection of additional category-ii claims beyond original rs.10 lakhs (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56)
8. only original 12 families qualify for category-i rs.25 lakhs; others category-ii (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65)
9. ma rejected; final compensation pending separate adjudication (Para 66 , 67 , 68)

-

JUDGMENT

PRESENT:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. AMIT STHALEKAR (JUDICIAL MEMBER)

HON’BLE DR. ARUN KUMAR VERMA (EXPERT MEMBER)

__________________________________________________________________

Reserved On:-06th December, 2024 Pronounce On:- 13th December, 2024

 __________________________________________________________________

1. Whether the Judgment is allowed to be published on the net? Yes

2. Whether the Judgment is allowed to be published in the NGT Reporter? Yes

Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicants and the learned Counsel for the Respondents and perused the documents on record.

2. The present Miscellaneous Application No.31/2023/EZ has been filed by the Applicant, seeking the following reliefs: -

(i) “direct the respondents to expeditiously disburse the balance interim compensation amount of Rs.10.00 lakhs per family to the 161 families in Category-I, i.e. Rs.25.00 lakhs (-) less advance Rs.15.00 lakhs = Rs.10.00 lakhs per family, and/or

(ii) direct the respondents to expeditiously disburse the balance interim compensation amount of Rs.10.00 lakhs per family to the 439 families in Category-II, i.e., Rs.20.00 lakhs (-) less advance Rs.10.00 lakhs = Rs.10.00 lakhs per family, and/or

(iii) grant such other consequential reliefs pertaining to “interim compensation” that this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper, including interest on the ‘interim compensation’ amount being due, and/or

(iv) pass any other such order(s)/direction(s) as this Hon’ble Tribunal seem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the present case.”

-

3. The Original Application No. 43/2020/EZ (Bonani Kakkar Vs. Oil India Limited) was taken up by the National Green Tribunal, New Delhi Bench, in respect of an incident relating to destruction and damage caused by the oil blowout and explosion that took place in BGN-5 Oil Well at Baghjan, Assam, stated to be due to the acts and omissions of the Oil India Limited.

4. The National Green Tribunal vide its order dated 24.06.2020 constituted a Committee of Experts headed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. P. Katakey, former Judge of the Guwahati High Court. A Preliminary Report dated 24.07.2020 was submitted by the Experts Committee before the National Green Tribunal, New Delhi Bench.

5. It is stated that the Committee was of the unanimous view that blowout and the subsequent explosion has led to extensive damage to the public owned resources and has also caused irreparable harm and damage to private owned property of the survivors in the affected villages.

6. The National Green Tribunal, New Delhi Bench vide its order dated 06.08.2020 observed that the Experts Committee assessed the interim compensation payable to the affected villagers and passed recommendation which is as under: -

-

“Preliminary Interim Measures IV. Interim Compensation to the affected families

1. The Committee, proposes the formulation of three categories of affected families to assess the question of interim compensation

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top