Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, Chairperson, SUDHIR AGARWAL, Judicial Member, A. SENTHIL VEL, Expert Member, AFROZ AHMAD, Expert Member
MUKESH JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
JUNED AYUBI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. mas seek modification of prior judgment for mining resumption. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. factual background of oa 442/2022 illegal mining allegations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. joint committee verifies site, finds permissions but boundary issues. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21) |
| 4. applicant's objections to joint committee report on ec mismatch. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 5. oa 692/2022 facts on lot 21/1 illegal mining claims. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. tribunal closes mining for ec transfer violations. (Para 28) |
| 7. review applications dismissed; supreme court grants liberty. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 8. ma applicant-i's case: ec transfer, policy compliance. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 9. ma applicant-ii's case mirrors compliance claims. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 10. replies affirm ec transfers, compensation on gmvn. (Para 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 11. arguments: resume mining without compensation liability. (Para 58 , 59) |
| 12. no recall sought; modification for resumption examined. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64) |
| 13. mous are leases, not agency; ma applicants independent proponents. (Para 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
