SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4713

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
ARAVALLI BACHAO CITIZENS MOVEMENT – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
362/2022 / DELHI



Advocates:
For the Petitioner: RAHUL CHOUDHARY
For the Respondent:

Item No.06 Court No. 2 BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Original Application No.362/2022 Aravalli Bachao Citizens Movement Applicant Versus Union of India Respondent Date of hearing: 06.08.2024 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER Applicant(s): Mr. Rahul Chaudhary and Ms. Itisha Awasthi Advocates Respondent(s): Mr. Rahul Khurana, Advocate for respondent nos.1 to

6 with Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Sub Inspector and Mr. Anil Kumar, ASI, Enforcement and Mr. Daljeet Singh, ASI, Gurugram Mr. Vikrant Panchanda, Advocate for CPCB

ORDER

1. The applicant, a non-partisan group of citizens from National Capital Region and across India has filed the present application under Sections 14 and 15 of National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NGT Act, 2010’) for issuing directions to respondents 2 to 6 to take steps to stop illegal stone and sand mining, undertake restoration activities, take strict action against defaulting officials and constitute an independent Aravalli Protection Authority for protection of the entire Aravalli range from further degradation.

2. The applicant has submitted that Aravallis serve as a natural barrier between Thar Desert and Northern part of the country and thereby reducing chances of desertification. The green forest cover helps in regulating temperature and maintaining rainfall pattern in and around the Aravallis. Destruction of Aravallis will lead to decreased forest cover, increase in pollution level, temperature and climate events in North India including National Capital Region of Delhi. With the environmental degradation of Aravallis, the water security of Northern India will be threatened and there will be an increase in human-animal conflict. Supreme Court vide order dated 08.05.2009 passed in I.A No. 1967 in I.A No. 1785 in Writ Petition (C) No. 4677 of 1985 titled as M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India reported as (2009) 6 SCC 142 had prohibited all mining operations in Aravalli Hill Range falling in Faridabad, Gurugram and Nuh (Mewat) districts in the State of Haryana within the area of approximately 480 sq.

kilometers.

3. The applicant has further submitted that despite prohibition of mining in the area, illegal mining is taking place in the area. The members of applicant undertook field visits to illegal mining sites in the months of March-April, 2021, June-July, 2021 and November 2021 to March 2022. During the site visits, it was found that the illegal mining is happening on 16 locations in contravention of abovementioned judicial verdict and environmental laws. At many locations, substantial portions of hills have been mined and taken away and, in some instances, completely razed to the ground. The members of applicant took photographs and made videos of the ongoing illegal mining and destruction caused to Arvallis as a result thereof. Along with these, they have also taken GPS coordinates of the said locations. With the use of GIS technology, they have also prepared the Satellite images and toposheets of the areas where illegal mining is being done. The Satellite images and toposheets have also confirmed ongoing illegal mining. The applicant made complaints dated 15.04.2021, 20.4.2021 and 31.05.2021 about illegal mining at 4 locations. The applicant also sent representation dated 07.03.2022 regarding illegal mining at 11 locations. However, neither any response has been received from any authority nor any action has been taken to stop illegal mining till date.

4. Tribunal took cognizance of the complaint on 23.05.2022 and being prima-facie satisfied that a substantial question relating to environment has arisen due to implementation of enactments specified in Schedule I to NGT Act, 2010, issued notices to respondents. It also sought a Factual Report by constituting a Joint Committee comprising representatives of Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (hereinafter referred to as ‘MoEF&CC’); Central

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top